Hum. Reprod. Advance Access originally published online on January 18, 2007
Human Reproduction 2007 22(5):1353-1358; doi:10.1093/humrep/del521
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The predictive value of medical history taking and Chlamydia IgG ELISA antibody testing (CAT) in the selection of subfertile women for diagnostic laparoscopy: a clinical prediction model approach
1 Centre for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2 Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands 3 Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Máxima Medical Centre, Veldhoven, The Netherlands 4 Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Aberdeen Maternity Hospital, Aberdeen, UK
5 To whom correspondence should be addressed at: Máxima Medical Centre, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, De Run 4600, 5500 MB Veldhoven, The Netherlands. Tel: +31 40 888 8384; Fax: +31 40 888 8387; E-mail: s.f.coppus{at}amc.uva.nl
BACKGROUND: Medical history taking as well as Chlamydia antibody titre (CAT) testing are currently used in the selection of patients for diagnostic laparoscopy with tubal patency testing. Most research has focused on the predictive value of CAT in isolation from medical history. We assessed therefore whether the combination of medical history and CAT improves the efficiency of selecting patients for laparoscopy as compared to the use of either medical history or CAT.
METHODS: Data of 207 consecutive subfertile women were used to create multivariable logistic regression models for the prediction of tubal disease as diagnosed by diagnostic laparoscopy.
RESULTS: The model with data of medical history only had an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.65 (95% CI 0.56–0.74). Addition of CAT increased the AUC to 0.70 (95% CI 0.62–0.78) (P = 0.065). CAT was positive in 40 women and showed a sensitivity of 0.37 (95% CI 0.26–0.49) for a specificity of 0.88 (95% CI 0.82–0.93). In CAT positive women, a blank medical history did not decrease the probability of tubal disease. Of the 167 women tested CAT negative, 23 (14%) still had a high probability of disease due to their medical history and 11 of them (48%) showed tubal abnormalities on diagnostic laparoscopy.
CONCLUSIONS: CAT testing adds valuable information to a woman's risk profile based on her medical history. The combination of medical history taking and CAT testing has a better yield for diagnosing tubal disease than either of these alone.
Key words: tubal pathology/medical history/Chlamydia antibody titer/CAT/laparoscopy
Submitted on July 14, 2006; resubmitted on November 16, 2006; accepted on December 14, 2006.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  J.E. den Hartog, C.M.J.G. Lardenoije, J.L. Severens, J.A. Land, J.L.H. Evers, and A.G.H. Kessels Screening strategies for tubal factor subfertility Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2008; 23(8): 1840 - 1848. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S.F.P.J. Coppus, H.R. Verhoeve, B.C. Opmeer, J.W. van der Steeg, P. Steures, M.J.C. Eijkemans, P.G.A. Hompes, P.M.M. Bossuyt, F. van der Veen, and B.W.J. Mol Identifying subfertile ovulatory women for timely tubal patency testing: a clinical decision rule based on medical history Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2007; 22(10): 2685 - 2692. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|