Skip Navigation


Hum. Reprod. Advance Access originally published online on January 24, 2007
Human Reproduction 2007 22(5):1396-1404; doi:10.1093/humrep/del511
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
22/5/1396    most recent
del511v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Capková, J.
Right arrow Articles by Novák, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Capková, J.
Right arrow Articles by Novák, P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Increased expression of secretory actin-binding protein on human spermatozoa is associated with poor semen quality

Jana Capková1,3, Fatima Elzeinová1 and Petr Novák2

1 Department of Biology and Biochemistry of Fertilization, Institute of Molecular Genetics 2 Laboratory of Molecular Structure Characterization, Institute of Microbiology, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Prague, Czech Republic

3 To whom correspondence should be addressed at: Email: capkova{at}biomed.cas.cz

BACKGROUND: Antibodies to human sperm are useful diagnostic reagents for detection of changes in sperm protein expression and their relationship with sperm defects and male infertility. The specificity of Hs-16 monoclonal antibody (mAb) and the localization and frequency of the occurrence of Hs-16-recognized protein on human spermatozoa were investigated.

METHODS: Samples from 30 fertile men with normal spermiograms and 30 men with pathological spermiograms were studied. The specificity of Hs-16 mAb was analysed by the western blotting technique and matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry. Indirect immunofluorescence with Hs-16 antibody was used to test sperm ejaculates.

RESULTS: The Hs-16 antibody detected a human sperm and seminal plasma protein, which was determined to be secretory actin-binding protein (SABP). This specificity was also verified by co-localization of SABP and actin on spermatozoa with Hs-16 and anti-actin antibodies, and partial co-localization of these proteins was found. SABP was localized on the sperm tail, mainly in the midpiece of the tail. Other parts of spermatozoa were labelled with lower frequency. A significant difference was found in SABP labelling between men with normal spermiograms and donors with asthenozoospermia or oligoasthenoteratozoospermia (both P < 0.01), and asthenozoospermia versus oligoasthenoteratozoospermia (P < 0.05). Increased expression of SABP was observed in men with pathological spermiograms.

CONCLUSIONS: Hs-16 antibody reacts specifically with SABP. SABP can serve as a marker of defective sperm and may be associated with fertility failure.

Key words: human spermatozoa/male fertility/monoclonal antibody/secretory actin-binding protein/semen quality

Submitted on July 13, 2006; resubmitted on November 9, 2006; accepted on December 11, 2006.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
J. Martinez-Heredia, S. de Mateo, J. M. Vidal-Taboada, J. L. Ballesca, and R. Oliva
Identification of proteomic differences in asthenozoospermic sperm samples
Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2008; 23(4): 783 - 791.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.