Skip Navigation

Human Reproduction 2007 22(6):1759-1768; doi:10.1093/humrep/dem063
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lalos, A.
Right arrow Articles by Lalos, O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lalos, A.
Right arrow Articles by Lalos, O.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Legislated right for donor-insemination children to know their genetic origin: a study of parental thinking

A. Lalos1,3, C. Gottlieb2 and O. Lalos1

1 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital, Umeå, Sweden 2 IVF Unit, Sophiahemmet Hospital and Division of Women and Child Health, Karolinska Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden

3 Correspondence address. Department of Obestetics and Gynecology, University Hospital, Umeå, Sweden. E-mail: ann.lalos{at}obgyn.umu.se

BACKGROUND: In Sweden, a child born as a result of donor insemination (DI) has the right to receive information both about the DI and the identity of the donor. The present study aimed to elucidate parents' thoughts regarding these possibilities, and whether, how and when they had told their offspring about the DI. An additional aim was to examine the parents' experiences of the attitudes of healthcare providers.

METHODS: A follow-up study using semi-structured telephone interviews with 19 couples, including 19 women and 17 men.

RESULTS: More than half of the parents (61%) had told all their child/ren about the DI, but almost everyone had told another person. Mean age for disclosure was 5 years for the first child. Reasons given for disclosure were to avoid accidental discovery, a desire for openness and a persons' fundamental right to know his/her genetic origin. Parents who did not intend to tell their child/ren considered DI a private matter and were afraid of other people's attitudes. Sixty-one percent of the parents had not yet told their children about the possibility of identifying the donor. Healthcare staff had impacted on the parents' thinking, and a majority of those who had been encouraged to tell their child/ren about the DI had done so.

CONCLUSIONS: There was a discrepancy between the intentions of the legislation and how parents act in relation to them. To improve compliance, it is crucial to organize education, support and ethical discussion among professionals, and to offer parents, and parents-to-be, counselling, support and group sessions with other DI families.

Key words: disclosure/donor identity/donor insemination/legislation/parents

Submitted on October 11, 2006; resubmitted on January 31, 2007; accepted on February 15, 2007.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
A. S. Svanberg, G. Sydsjo, K. E. Selling, and C. Lampic
Attitudes towards gamete donation among Swedish gynaecologists and obstetricians
Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2008; 23(4): 904 - 911.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.