Skip Navigation


Hum. Reprod. Advance Access originally published online on March 30, 2007
Human Reproduction 2007 22(6):1795-1796; doi:10.1093/humrep/dem047
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
22/6/1795    most recent
dem047v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Martinez-Madrid, B.
Right arrow Articles by Donnez, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Martinez-Madrid, B.
Right arrow Articles by Donnez, J.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Letters to the Editor

Cryopreservation of intact human ovary with its vascular pedicle—or cryopreservation of hemiovaries?

Belen Martinez-Madrid and Jacques Donnez1

Department of Gynecology, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium

1 Correspondence address. Department of Gynecology, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium. E-mail: donnez@gyne.ucl.ac.be

The first 10% of the full text of this article appears below.

Sir,

We read with interest the manuscript of Bedaiwy et al. (2006)Go entitled ‘Cryopreservation of intact human ovary with its vascular pedicle’, but feel there are some important details that the authors need to address for a clearer understanding of their work.

First, we do not agree with the title, which suggests that ‘intact human ovary has been cryopreserved with its vascular pedicle’. Indeed, in both the title and the manuscript, the authors defined the ovaries as intact ovaries for all the steps of the cryopreservation . . . [Full Text of this Article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?