Skip Navigation


Hum. Reprod. Advance Access originally published online on July 17, 2007
Human Reproduction 2007 22(9):2572-2573; doi:10.1093/humrep/dem228
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
22/9/2572    most recent
dem228v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Amann, R.P.
Right arrow Articles by Seidel, G.E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Amann, R.P.
Right arrow Articles by Seidel, G.E., Jr
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Letters to the Editor

Testis development, beef consumption and study methods

R.P. Amann1 and G.E. Seidel, Jr

Animal Reproduction and Biotechnology Laboratory, Colorado State University, Ft Collins, CO 80523, USA

1 Correspondence address. Tel: +1-970-226-0682; Fax: +1-970-226-2340; E-mail: rpalra63@msn.com

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

Sir,

We read with interest the paper by Swan et al. (2007)Go. For reasons outlined below, we have concluded that the study might receive more credence than justified. Typically, pre-study reviews include: (i) is the question or goal important; and (ii) can the best answer to the question(s) posed be obtained via the planned methods. The unstated but described goal of this study was to non-invasively examine spermatogenesis in fertile adult men, to determine if beef consumption by their mother during pregnancy might have affected fetal development of their testes, as evidenced by seminal characteristics many years later. The underlying question, if meat might be an important vector to inadvertently deliver xenotoxins to pregnant mothers, and hence their fetuses, is important. Quantitative and qualitative aspects of spermatogenesis were probed via analysis of semen in a single masturbation sample from each male. Swan et al. (2007)Go did not mention why . . . [Full Text of this Article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?