Hum. Reprod. Advance Access originally published online on September 14, 2008
Human Reproduction 2008 23(12):2867-2868; doi:10.1093/humrep/den341
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org
Letters to the Editor |
Reply: Adapting infertility treatment to religious beliefs
Department of Philosophy and Moral Science, Bioethics Institute Ghent (BIG), Ghent University, Blandijnberg 2, B-9000 Gent, Belgium
1 Tel/Fax: +32-16-620-767; E-mail: guido.pennings@ugent.be
| The first 10% of the full text of this article appears below. |
Sir,
The letter by Thomas (2008)
raises an interesting question: to what extent do practitioners have a duty to look for treatment adapted to the religious and ethical values of the patients? In the field of medically assisted reproduction, the clinicians tackle subfertility as a scientific (mechanical–technical) challenge. Something is preventing conception and/or pregnancy and that something should be eliminated. IVF was originally a solution for blocked tubes. Theoretically, a purely technical solution ignores religious, ethical and cultural considerations. In reality, there is always interaction between such considerations and the solution because selecting