Skip Navigation


Hum. Reprod. Advance Access originally published online on March 17, 2008
Human Reproduction 2008 23(5):1093-1100; doi:10.1093/humrep/den080
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF )
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
23/5/1093    most recent
den080v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mettler, L.
Right arrow Articles by Avelar, R.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mettler, L.
Right arrow Articles by Avelar, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

A safety and efficacy study of a resorbable hydrogel for reduction of post-operative adhesions following myomectomy{dagger}

L. Mettler1,7, J. Hucke2, B. Bojahr3, H.-R. Tinneberg4, N. Leyland5 and R. Avelar6

1 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Clinics of Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Michaelisstrasse 16, 24105 Kiel, Germany 2 Bethesda Krankenhaus Wuppertal, 42109 Wuppertal, Germany 3 Klinik für Minimal Invasive Chirurgie, 14129 Berlin, Germany 4 Universitätsklinikum Giessen, D-35385 Giessen, Germany 5 Obstetrics and Gynecology, St Joseph's Health Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M6R 3B2 6 Medical Affairs, Angiotech Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada V6A 1B6

7 Correspondence address. Tel: +49-431597-2086; Fax: +49-431597-2116; E-mail: endo-office{at}email.uni-kiel.de; lmettler{at}email.uni-kiel.de

BACKGROUND: This multicenter, randomized, single-blind study assessed the safety and efficacy of a resorbable hydrogel (‘Hydrogel’) for the reduction of post-operative adhesion formation following myomectomy.

METHODS: Women (n = 71) who were undergoing laparoscopic (67.6%) or laparotomic myomectomy were randomized (2:1) to Hydrogel (sprayed over surgically treated areas prior to wound closure, n = 48) or to control (standard care, n = 23). Patients (38 Hydrogel, 20 control) returned 8–10 weeks later for a second look. Adhesions were graded using a modified American Fertility Society (mAFS) scoring method. The primary efficacy measure was the posterior uterus mAFS score.

RESULTS: For Hydrogel and control patients, respectively, mean ± SD mAFS scores were 0.5 ± 1.4 and 0.0 ± 0.0 at baseline, and 1.1 ± 1.9 and 2.6 ± 2.2 at the second look. Similarly, mean changes from baseline were 0.8 ± 2.0 and 2.6 ± 2.2 (P = 0.01); 95% confidence intervals for these mean changes were (0.16–1.44) and (1.64–3.56). Adverse events were reported by 9.6 and 17.4% of Hydrogel and control patients, respectively. No intra-abdominal infections or post-operative site infections were reported.

CONCLUSIONS: This 71-patient study provides the first clinical evidence of the safety and efficacy of Hydrogel for the reduction of adhesions following myomectomy.

The ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier is NCT00562471 [ClinicalTrials.gov] .

Key words: adhesions/gynecologic surgery/laparoscopy/laparotomy/polyethylene glycol


{dagger} These data were presented at the 19th European Congress of Obstetrics and Gynecology (EBCOG) meeting, 5–8 April 2006 in Torino, Italy.

Submitted on July 18, 2007; resubmitted on January 22, 2008; accepted on February 22, 2008.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.