Skip Navigation


Hum. Reprod. Advance Access originally published online on March 27, 2008
Human Reproduction 2008 23(6):1242-1245; doi:10.1093/humrep/den094
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
23/6/1242    most recent
den094v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by van Empel, I. W.H.
Right arrow Articles by Kremer, J. A.M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by van Empel, I. W.H.
Right arrow Articles by Kremer, J. A.M.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Coming soon to your clinic: high-quality ART

Inge W.H. van Empel1,3, Willianne L.D.M. Nelen1, Rosella P.M.G. Hermens2 and Jan A.M. Kremer1

1 Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands 2 Centre for Quality of Care Research (WOK), Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands

3 Correspondence address. E-mail: i.vanempel{at}obgyn.umcn.nl

The concept of ‘patient-friendly’ medically assisted reproduction includes a robust set of clinical practice principles, to improve the quality of subfertility care. This concept is an important move away from the sole focus on effectiveness and high pregnancy rates in assisted reproduction technology (ART). Although the concept of ‘patient-friendly ART’ has several strong points, we feel it is incomplete. For achieving true high-quality ART, the concept should be extended to two more dimensions: timeliness and patient centredness. Moreover, we propose a change in the concept's name to the less ambiguous ‘high-quality ART’.

Key words: quality of care/subfertility/patient-centred care/patient-friendly IVF

Submitted on December 14, 2007; resubmitted on February 19, 2008; accepted on March 3, 2008.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Hum ReprodHome page
I. W.H. van Empel, W. L.D.M. Nelen, E. T. Tepe, E. A.P. van Laarhoven, C. M. Verhaak, and J. A.M. Kremer
Weaknesses, strengths and needs in fertility care according to patients
Hum. Reprod., October 27, 2009; (2009) dep362v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Hum ReprodHome page
A. K. Thomas
Adapting infertility treatment to religious beliefs
Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2008; 23(12): 2867 - 2867.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.