Skip Navigation


Hum. Reprod. Advance Access originally published online on December 19, 2008
Human Reproduction 2009 24(3):756; doi:10.1093/humrep/den448
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF )
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
24/3/756    most recent
den448v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sharara, F. I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sharara, F. I.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Letters to the Editor

Ultrasound-guided hydrosalpinx aspiration during oocyte collection improves outcome in IVF

Fady I. Sharara

Virginia Center for Reproductive Medicine
Reston, VA, USA
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology
George Washington University
Washington, DC, USA
E-mail: fsharara@vcrmed.com

The first 10% of the full text of this article appears below.

Sir,

I read with interest the manuscript by Hammadeh et al. (2008)Go. The authors prospectively analyzed 66 women between October 1999 and June 2003 who had hydrosalpinges (HSPX) noted on ultrasound on the ninth day of ovarian stimulation and were randomized into an aspiration group . . . [Full Text of this Article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?