Skip Navigation


Hum. Reprod. Advance Access originally published online on April 10, 2009
Human Reproduction 2009 24(8):1811-1817; doi:10.1093/humrep/dep084
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF )
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
24/8/1811    most recent
dep084v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in Hum. Reprod.
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bottomley, C.
Right arrow Articles by Bourne, T.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bottomley, C.
Right arrow Articles by Bourne, T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

The optimal timing of an ultrasound scan to assess the location and viability of an early pregnancy

C. Bottomley1,5, V. Van Belle2, F. Mukri1, E. Kirk3, S. Van Huffel2, D. Timmerman4 and T. Bourne1,3,4

1 Early Pregnancy and Gynaecology Ultrasound Unit, St George's University of London, London, UK 2 Department of Electrical Engineering (ESAT), Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium 3 Imperial College London, Hammersmith Campus, Du Cane Road, London, UK 4 Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospitals KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium

5 Correspondence address. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, St George's University of London, Third Floor Lanesborough Wing, Cranmer Terrace, London SW17 0RE, UK. Tel: +44-7985-937833; Fax: +44-20-8725-0094; E-mail: ceciliabottomley{at}doctors.org.uk

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to determine the optimal gestational age at which to establish the location and viability of an early pregnancy using transvaginal ultrasonography (TVS).

METHODS: This was a prospective study of 1442 women undergoing initial TVS at no more than 84 days gestation. Logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the relationship between gestational age and the ability to confirm viability or non-viability, in women with and without symptoms of pain and bleeding.

RESULTS: The commonest TVS finding prior to 35 days was a pregnancy of unknown location, from 35 to 41 days an early intrauterine pregnancy of uncertain viability and from 42 days a viable intrauterine pregnancy. Miscarriage could only be diagnosed on initial TVS after 35 days. There was no difference between the ability to make a diagnosis for women with certain or uncertain dates (P = 0.719). The chance of confirming viability increased rapidly per day of gestation until 49 days and thereafter plateaued. Of the 29 ectopic pregnancies diagnosed, 72% presented prior to 49 days gestation and all of these women presented with pain, bleeding or a previous ectopic pregnancy history.

CONCLUSIONS: The ability to confirm viability or non-viability is significantly related to gestational age. In asymptomatic women with no previous ectopic pregnancy TVS should be delayed until 49 days. Our data suggest that this would reduce the number of inconclusive scans, without an associated increase in morbidity from missed ectopic pregnancies.

Key words: first trimester/pregnancy/diagnosis/transvaginal ultrasound/viability

Submitted on December 4, 2008; resubmitted on March 2, 2009; accepted on March 6, 2009.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?

Related articles in Hum. Reprod.:

Editor's Choice
André Van Steirteghem
Hum. Reprod. 2009 24: 1773. [Extract] [Full Text]  





Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.