Hum. Reprod. Advance Access published online on March 11, 2004
Human Reproduction, doi:10.1093/humrep/deh181
© 2004 by European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 The Fertility Institute of New Orleans, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA; Section of Reproductive Endocrinology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Louisiana State University School of Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA; The Fertility Institute of New Orleans, 6020 Bullard Avenue, New Orleans, Louisiana 70128, USA
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: info{at}fertilityinstitute.com.
The 2002 recommendation of the consensus meeting of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE) that the outcome measure of assisted reproductive technology (ART) and non-ART should be ‘singleton live birth rate’ could profoundly effect the ability of infertility patients to become pregnant. We reviewed published reports and new data concerning elective single embryo transfer (eSET) vs. double embryo transfer (DET) and the outcome of twin pregnancies in the United States, as well as recommendations of other Societies concerning number of embryos to transfer and methods used to measure ART success. We found that no single outcome measure of ART is ideal. Mandatory eSET would result in 42%-70% fewer births compared to DET. Infertility treatments account for only 12% of all twin pregnancies and 4% of all premature births in the United States. Twin and singleton births due to ART do not occur earlier than spontaneously conceived twins and singletons unless they started as triplet and higher order pregnancies. Multiple outcome measures are necessary when evaluating ART success. Twin as well as singleton births should be counted as ART successes. The essential aim of infertility treatment should be a healthy low order (singleton or twin) birth. Key words:
Key words: assisted reproductive technology; in vitro fertilization; outcome measures; twin births; singleton births
Accepted December 16, 2003
Debate - continued
What is the most relevant standard of success in assisted reproduction?
2 The Fertility Institute of New Orleans, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA
Abstract 
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  R.H.F. van Oppenraaij, E. Jauniaux, O.B. Christiansen, J.A. Horcajadas, R.G. Farquharson, N. Exalto, and on behalf of the ESHRE Special Interest Group for Predicting adverse obstetric outcome after early pregnancy events and complications: a review Hum. Reprod. Update, July 1, 2009; 15(4): 409 - 421. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. Devroey, B.C.J.M. Fauser, K. Diedrich, and on behalf of the Evian Annual Reproduction (EVAR) Approaches to improve the diagnosis and management of infertility Hum. Reprod. Update, July 1, 2009; 15(4): 391 - 408. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S.M. Mourad, W.L.D.M. Nelen, R.P.M.G. Hermens, L.F. Bancsi, D.D.M. Braat, G.A. Zielhuis, R.P.T.M. Grol, and J.A.M. Kremer Variation in subfertility care measured by guideline-based performance indicators Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2008; 23(11): 2493 - 2500. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S.M. Mourad, R.P.M.G. Hermens, W.L.D.M. Nelen, D.D.M. Braat, R.P.T.M. Grol, and J.A.M. Kremer Guideline-based development of quality indicators for subfertility care Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2007; 22(10): 2665 - 2672. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
W. Ombelet, G. Martens, P. De Sutter, J. Gerris, E. Bosmans, G. Ruyssinck, P. Defoort, G. Molenberghs, and W. Gyselaers Perinatal outcome of 12 021 singleton and 3108 twin births after non-IVF-assisted reproduction: a cohort study Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2006; 21(4): 1025 - 1032. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. De Neubourg, J. Gerris, K. Mangelschots, E. Van Royen, M. Vercruyssen, A. Steylemans, and M. Elseviers The obstetrical and neonatal outcome of babies born after single-embryo transfer in IVF/ICSI compares favourably to spontaneously conceived babies Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2006; 21(4): 1041 - 1046. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. P. Dickey and R. Pyrzak Preimplantation genetic screening will play a dominant role in selecting embryos for single embryo transfer Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2005; 20(10): 2978 - 2978. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Pinborg, O. Lidegaard, N. la Cour Freiesleben, and A. N. Andersen Consequences of vanishing twins in IVF/ICSI pregnancies Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2005; 20(10): 2821 - 2829. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. M.R. Gerris Single embryo transfer and IVF/ICSI outcome: a balanced appraisal Hum. Reprod. Update, March 1, 2005; 11(2): 105 - 121. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. N. Barri Multiple pregnancies: a plea for informed caution Hum. Reprod. Update, January 1, 2005; 11(1): 1 - 2. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Germond, F. Urner, A. Chanson, M.-P. Primi, D. Wirthner, and A. Senn What is the most relevant standard of success in assisted reproduction?: The cumulated singleton/twin delivery rates per oocyte pick-up: the CUSIDERA and CUTWIDERA Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2004; 19(11): 2442 - 2444. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E.M.E.W. Heijnen, N.S. Macklon, and B.C.J.M. Fauser What is the most relevant standard of success in assisted reproduction?: The next step to improving outcomes of IVF: consider the whole treatment Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2004; 19(9): 1936 - 1938. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|