Skip Navigation



Hum. Reprod. Advance Access published online on March 11, 2004
Human Reproduction, doi:10.1093/humrep/deh190
© 2004 by European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
19/4/775    most recent
deh190v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by James, W. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by James, W. H.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Debate - continued

‘Over-ripeness ovopathy, sex ratio increase and sex ratio reversal a challenging hypothesis for sex ratio modulation’

William H. James 1

1 The Galton Laboratory, University College London, Wolfson House, 4 Stephenson Way, London NW1 2HE, UK


  Abstract

It is suggested here that Jongbloet has misinterpreted data on the variation of sex ratio with maternal age, social class, placental dysfunction, twinning and season. When all these matters are considered, it is not clear whether there is any truth in his supposition that male fetuses are generally conceived in suboptimal conditions. Finally, it is suggested that there is a circularity in his presentation of his concept of sex ratio ‘reversal’.

Key words: Key words: fertile interval/hormonal profile/male and female conception/ovopathy/sex ratio


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Hum ReprodHome page
C. E. Boklage
The epigenetic environment: secondary sex ratio depends on differential survival in embryogenesis
Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2005; 20(3): 583 - 587.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Hum ReprodHome page
A. Cagnacci
Reply to 'Influences of maternal weight on the secondary sex ratio of human offspring'
Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2004; 19(10): 2425 - 2426.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.