Hum. Reprod. Advance Access published online on March 25, 2004
Human Reproduction, doi:10.1093/humrep/deh206
© 2004 by European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, McGill University, Royal Victoria Hospital, 687, avenue des Pins Ouest, Montréal, Canada H3A 1A1
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: william.buckett{at}muhc.mcgill.ca.
Whilst there is a need to emphasize the birth rates of healthy infants when reporting success rates following infertility treatment, is the singleton term gestation per cycle started the most appropriate measure? Although there are many ways to measure the efficacy of medical intervention, none of these exclude from the successes those in whom complications have occurred. The safe delivery of healthy twins at term, while possibly not the ideal outcome, should still be regarded as a treatment success. Although multiple pregnancy, in particular high order multiple pregnancy, continues to be a major problem associated with assisted reproductive treatments and also with ovulation induction, appropriate counselling concerning the risks of twin and triplet pregnancies will allow couples to make informed choices and allow clinicians to continue to individualize treatment plans. Key words:
Key words: assisted reproduciton/success rates/multiple gestation/informed choice
Debate
What is the most relevant standard of success in assisted reproduction? The importance of informed choice
2 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, McGill University, Montréal, Canada
![]()
Abstract ![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
N. Gleicher and D. Barad The relative myth of elective single embryo transfer Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2006; 21(6): 1337 - 1344. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M.R. Gerris Single embryo transfer and IVF/ICSI outcome: a balanced appraisal Hum. Reprod. Update, March 1, 2005; 11(2): 105 - 121. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||

