Hum. Reprod. Advance Access published online on March 25, 2004
Human Reproduction, doi:10.1093/humrep/deh216
© 2004 by European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 Division of Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Vrije Universiteit Medical Centre, De Boelelaan 1117, Postbus 7057, 1007 MB Amsterdam, The Netherlands
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: cb.lambalk{at}vumc.nl.
The evaluation of ovarian reserve, often critical for the elderly infertile woman, is notoriously difficult and inaccurate. The place of ovarian biopsy in this evaluation has been hotly disputed for three decades, but not resolved. To examine the feasibility of ovarian biopsy for this purpose, a project was designed to estimate the total number of oocytes in a human ovary and investigate whether any biopsy regimen is representative of the follicular reserve in an individual. Ovaries removed from patients of reproductive age during operations not involving ovarian pathology were utilized to count the number and type of follicles found in multiple biopsies of 2 and 5 mm and in the whole ovary. Representative results taking into account the total number of follicles found in the whole ovary showed that predicted values based on the biopsies were extremely varied. We concluded that due to the huge variation in the distribution of follicles across the surface of the ovary, there is no place for this procedure in clinical evaluation of reproductive ageing in the individual patient. Key words:
Key words: biopsy/ovarian reserve
Debate continued
Assessment of ovarian reserve: Ovarian biopsy is not a valid method for the prediction of ovarian reserve
2 Division of Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, VU Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
3 Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Medisch Centrum Alkmaar, Alkmaar, The Netherlands
4 The Jones Institute for Reproductive Medicine, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, VA, USA
![]()
Abstract ![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
F.J. Broekmans, J. Kwee, D.J. Hendriks, B.W. Mol, and C.B. Lambalk A systematic review of tests predicting ovarian reserve and IVF outcome Hum. Reprod. Update, November 1, 2006; 12(6): 685 - 718. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Maheshwari, P. Fowler, and S. Bhattacharya Assessment of ovarian reserve--should we perform tests of ovarian reserve routinely? Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2006; 21(11): 2729 - 2735. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Lutchman Singh, M. Davies, and R. Chatterjee Fertility in female cancer survivors: pathophysiology, preservation and the role of ovarian reserve testing Hum. Reprod. Update, January 1, 2005; 11(1): 69 - 89. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||

