Skip Navigation



Hum. Reprod. Advance Access published online on May 13, 2004
Human Reproduction, doi:10.1093/humrep/deh288
© 2004 by European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
19/7/1598    most recent
deh288v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Utsunomiya, T.
Right arrow Articles by Sato, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Utsunomiya, T.
Right arrow Articles by Sato, J.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Received September 12, 2003
Accepted April 2, 2004

Article

A prospective, randomized study: day 3 versus hatching blastocyst stage

Takafumi Utsunomiya 1*, Hiroko Ito 2, Miyuki Nagaki 1, Junko Sato 1

1 St Luke Clinic, 5, Tsumori-Tomioka, Oita City 870-0947, Japan
2 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oita University Faculty of Medicine, 1 Idaigaoka, Hasamacho, 879-5593, Oita Prefecture, Japan

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: st-luke{at}oct-net.ne.jp.


  Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recently, advances in human IVF-embryo transfer (ET) have been reported using sequential media and blastocyst stage ET. In our previous report, using a prospective, randomized study, no advantage was found using the blastocyst stage ET compared with day 3 ET. This study was performed in order to evaluate implantation and pregnancy rates of hatching blastocyst stage ET compared with conventional day 3 ET. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 480 patient cycles were evaluated using a prospective, randomized study. The pregnancy rate and implantation rate were compared between the day 3 ET (n = 240) and hatching blastocyst stage ET (Hat ET; n = 240). The Hat ET group had a pregnancy rate of 29.3% (55 out of 188) and an implantation rate of 21.4% (67 out of 313). The day 3 ET group had a pregnancy rate of 29.2% (70 out of 240) and an implantation rate of 19.1% (93 out of 488). In the Hat ET group, the pregnancy rate, implantation rate and ongoing pregnancy rate of day 5 ET and day 6 ET were all higher than the respective rates in the day 7-9 ET group. CONCLUSION: We found that the pregnancy rate and implantation rate of ET with hatching stage blastocysts had no advantage compared with the conventional day 3 ET.

Key words: blastocyst culture/embryo transfer/hatching stage/pregnancy rate


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Hum ReprodHome page
E. G. Papanikolaou, E. M. Kolibianakis, H. Tournaye, C. A Venetis, H. Fatemi, B. Tarlatzis, and P. Devroey
Live birth rates after transfer of equal number of blastocysts or cleavage-stage embryos in IVF. A systematic review and meta-analysis
Hum. Reprod., January 1, 2008; 23(1): 91 - 99.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
J. M.R. Gerris
Single embryo transfer and IVF/ICSI outcome: a balanced appraisal
Hum. Reprod. Update, March 1, 2005; 11(2): 105 - 121.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.