Skip Navigation



Hum. Reprod. Advance Access published online on June 30, 2004

Human Reproduction, doi:10.1093/humrep/deh381
© 2004 by European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
19/9/2163    most recent
deh381v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hagemans, M. L.C.
Right arrow Articles by Grobbee, D. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hagemans, M. L.C.
Right arrow Articles by Grobbee, D. E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Received October 14, 2003
Accepted May 24, 2004

Article

Indicators for the total duration of premenopausal endogenous estrogen exposure in relation to BMD

Maria L.C. Hagemans 1, Yvonne T. van der Schouw 2*, Miriam J.J. de Kleijn 2, Wija A. van Staveren 1, Victor J.M. Pop 3, Geraline L. Leusink 4, Diederick E. Grobbee 2

1 Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Room D 01.335, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands; Division of Human Nutrition and Epidemiology, Wageningen University, PO Box 8129, 6700 EV Wageningen, The Netherlands
2 Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Room D 01.335, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands
3 Department of Clinical Health Psychology, University of Tilburg, PO Box 90153, 5000 LE Tilburg, The Netherlands
4 Diagnostic Centre Eindhoven, Stratumse Dijk 28a, 5611 NE Eindhoven, The Netherlands

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: y.t.vanderschouw{at}umcutrecht.nl.


   Abstract

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have shown that age at menopause is an important indicator of duration of endogenous estrogen exposure. The present study investigates whether combining more information on reproductive factors is useful in estimating individual total duration of exposure to endogenous estrogens. METHODS: Bone mineral density (BMD) was used as operational outcome. The study population consisted of 3476 white women living in Eindhoven, The Netherlands, aged 46-57 years, either pre- (n=2420) or postmenopausal (n=1056). BMD of the lumbar spine was measured by dual X-ray absorptiometry. Information on reproductive factors was obtained with questionnaires. RESULTS: The number of reproductive years explained 4.8% of the variance in BMD, while age at menopause alone accounted for 3.6%. Duration of lactation or oral contraceptive use did not add to the proportion of variance explained. The effect of reproductive years on BMD was stronger in older women. No significant associations with BMD were found for other reproductive variables. The number of miscarriages in premenopausal women ({beta}=0.00760, SE = 0.00357, P=0.03) explained only 0.16% of the variance in BMD. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that it is not necessary to use more reproductive factors besides age at menopause and menarche in determining total duration of endogenous estrogen exposure.

Keywords: bone mineral density; estrogen; premenopausal; postmenopausal; reproductive factors.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
A. Emaus, S. Espetvedt, M.B. Veierod, R. Ballard-Barbash, A.-S. Furberg, P.T. Ellison, G. Jasienska, A. Hjartaker, and I. Thune
17-{beta}-Estradiol in relation to age at menarche and adult obesity in premenopausal women
Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2008; 23(4): 919 - 927.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.