Hum. Reprod. Advance Access published online on August 19, 2004
Human Reproduction, doi:10.1093/humrep/deh476
© 2004 by European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 Department of Cell Biology, Harvard Medical School, 240 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02115, USA
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: john_biggers{at}hms.harvard.edu.
The advice that should be given to a couple considering assisted reproductive technologies for the treatment of their infertility, when they are completely opposed to the destruction of surplus embryos, is discussed. It is urged that they do not use treatments that generate surplus embryos. They should be given the options of declining IVF and considering adoption, or less efficient treatments, namely limited ovarian stimulation, limited insemination of available ova or natural cycle IVF where no surplus embryos are generated.
Accepted July 23, 2004
Opinion
When to avoid creating surplus human embryos
2 Reproductive Science Center, Old Forbes Road, Lexington, MA 02421 and Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA 10655, USA
![]()
Abstract ![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M.J. Pelinck, N.E.A. Vogel, A. Hoek, A.H.M. Simons, E.G.J.M. Arts, M.H. Mochtar, S. Beemsterboer, M.N. Hondelink, and M.J. Heineman Cumulative pregnancy rates after three cycles of minimal stimulation IVF and results according to subfertility diagnosis: a multicentre cohort study Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2006; 21(9): 2375 - 2383. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
