Hum. Reprod. Advance Access published online on November 11, 2004
Human Reproduction, doi:10.1093/humrep/deh579
© 2004 by European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 Section of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Mayo Clinic, College of Medicine Rochester, MN, USA
Among the many educational materials produced by the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE) are guidelines. ESHRE guidelines may be developed for many reasons but their intent is always to promote best quality practices in reproductive medicine. In an era in which preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) has become a reality, we must strive to maintain its efficacy and credibility by offering the safest and most effective treatment available. The dominant motivators for the development of current comprehensive guidelines for best PGD practice were (i) the absence of guidelines and/or regulation for PGD in many countries and (ii) the observation that no consensus exists on many of the clinical and technical aspects of PGD. As a consequence, the ESHRE PGD Consortium undertook to draw up guidelines aimed at giving information, support and guidance to potential, fledgling and established PGD centres. The success of a PGD treatment cycle is the result of great attention to detail. We have strived to provide a similar level of detail in this document and hope that it will assist staff in achieving the best clinical outcome for their patients.
Accepted September 29, 2004
Article
ESHRE PGD Consortium Best practice guidelines for clinical preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) and preimplantation genetic screening (PGS)
2 Department of Clinical Genetics, University Hospital Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands
3 Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University College, London, UK
4 Genetics and IVF Institute, Fairfax, VA, USA
5 Institute of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Royal Postgraduate Medical School, Hammersmith Hospital, UK
6 Service de Biologie de la Reproduction, SIHCUS-CMCO, 19 Rue Louis Pasteur, BP120, 67303 Schiltigheim, France
7 The Leeds PGD Centre, Assisted Conception Unit, Leeds General Infirmary, Leeds, UK
8 Section of Reproductive Medicine, University of Kiel, Germany
9 Department of Cytogenetics, and Centre for Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis, Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Trust, Guy's Hospital, London, UK
10 Centre for Medical Genetics, Dutch-speaking Brussels Free University, Brussels, Belgium
11 Melbourne IVF, 320 Victoria Parade, 3002 East Melbourne VIC, Australia
![]()
Abstract ![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
G. Altarescu, T. Eldar-Geva, I. Varshower, B. Brooks, E. Z. Haran, E. J. Margalioth, E. Levy-Lahad, and P. Renbaum Real-time reverse linkage using polar body analysis for preimplantation genetic diagnosis in female carriers of de novo mutations Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2009; 24(12): 3225 - 3229. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. De Vos, C. Staessen, M. De Rycke, W. Verpoest, P. Haentjens, P. Devroey, I. Liebaers, and H. Van de Velde Impact of cleavage-stage embryo biopsy in view of PGD on human blastocyst implantation: a prospective cohort of single embryo transfers Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2009; 24(12): 2988 - 2996. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Goossens, G. Harton, C. Moutou, J. Traeger-Synodinos, M. Van Rij, and J.C. Harper ESHRE PGD Consortium data collection IX: cycles from January to December 2006 with pregnancy follow-up to October 2007 Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2009; 24(8): 1786 - 1810. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Rubio, C. Gimenez, E. Fernandez, X. Vendrell, E. Velilla, M. Parriego, L. Rodrigo, and for Spanish Interest Group in Preimplantation Gene The importance of good practice in preimplantation genetic screening: critical viewpoints Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2009; 24(8): 2045 - 2047. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Oracova, P. Musilova, O. Kopecna, R. Rybar, M. Vozdova, K. Vesela, and J. Rubes Sperm and Embryo Analysis in a Carrier of Supernumerary inv dup(15) Marker Chromosome J Androl, May 1, 2009; 30(3): 233 - 239. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Wilton, A. Thornhill, J. Traeger-Synodinos, K.D. Sermon, and J.C. Harper The causes of misdiagnosis and adverse outcomes in PGD Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2009; 24(5): 1221 - 1228. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Goossens, G. Harton, C. Moutou, P.N. Scriven, J. Traeger-Synodinos, K. Sermon, and J.C. Harper ESHRE PGD Consortium data collection VIII: cycles from January to December 2005 with pregnancy follow-up to October 2006 Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2008; 23(12): 2629 - 2645. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Dreesen, M. Drusedau, H. Smeets, C. de Die-Smulders, E. Coonen, J. Dumoulin, M. Gielen, J. Evers, J. Herbergs, and J. Geraedts Validation of preimplantation genetic diagnosis by PCR analysis: genotype comparison of the blastomere and corresponding embryo, implications for clinical practice Mol. Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2008; 14(10): 573 - 579. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. C. Magli, E. Van den Abbeel, K. Lundin, D. Royere, J. Van der Elst, L. Gianaroli, and for Committee of the Special Interest Group on Emb Revised guidelines for good practice in IVF laboratories Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2008; 23(6): 1253 - 1262. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
The ESHRE Capri Workshop Group Genetic aspects of female reproduction Hum. Reprod. Update, April 2, 2008; (2008) dmn009v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.C. Harper, C. de Die-Smulders, V. Goossens, G. Harton, C. Moutou, S. Repping, P.N Scriven, S. SenGupta, J. Traeger-Synodinos, M.C. Van Rij, et al. ESHRE PGD consortium data collection VII: cycles from January to December 2004 with pregnancy follow-up to October 2005 Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2008; 23(4): 741 - 755. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. E. Oro Dermatology in the Postgenomic Era: Harnessing Human Variation for Personalized Medicine Arch Dermatol, March 1, 2008; 144(3): 389 - 391. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Goossens, M. De Rycke, A. De Vos, C. Staessen, A. Michiels, W. Verpoest, A. Van Steirteghem, C. Bertrand, I. Liebaers, P. Devroey, et al. Diagnostic efficiency, embryonic development and clinical outcome after the biopsy of one or two blastomeres for preimplantation genetic diagnosis Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2008; 23(3): 481 - 492. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. M.H. Combelles What are the trade-offs between one-cell and two-cell biopsies of preimplantation embryos? Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2008; 23(3): 493 - 498. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A.L. Bredenoord, G. Pennings, H.J. Smeets, and G. de Wert Dealing with uncertainties: ethics of prenatal diagnosis and preimplantation genetic diagnosis to prevent mitochondrial disorders Hum. Reprod. Update, January 1, 2008; 14(1): 83 - 94. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
The ESHRE Capri Workshop Group Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) in 2006: Evidence and Evolution Hum. Reprod. Update, November 1, 2007; 13(6): 515 - 526. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Diedrich, B.C.J.M. Fauser, P. Devroey, G. Griesinger, and on behalf of the Evian Annual Reproduction (EVAR) The role of the endometrium and embryo in human implantation Hum. Reprod. Update, July 1, 2007; 13(4): 365 - 377. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W.L.D.M. Nelen, R.P.M.G. Hermens, S.M. Mourad, E.C. Haagen, R.P.T.M. Grol, and J.A.M. Kremer Monitoring reproductive health in Europe: what are the best indicators of reproductive health? A need for evidence-based quality indicators of reproductive health care Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2007; 22(4): 916 - 918. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. B. Baart, E. Martini, M. J. Eijkemans, D. Van Opstal, N. G.M. Beckers, A. Verhoeff, N. S. Macklon, and B. C.J.M. Fauser Milder ovarian stimulation for in-vitro fertilization reduces aneuploidy in the human preimplantation embryo: a randomized controlled trial Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2007; 22(4): 980 - 988. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. N. Peshkin, R. H. Nusbaum, and T. A. DeMarco Genetic Counseling About Reproductive Options for Hereditary Cancer: What Is the Standard of Care? J. Clin. Oncol., March 1, 2007; 25(7): 911 - 912. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K.D. Sermon, A. Michiels, G. Harton, C. Moutou, S. Repping, P.N. Scriven, S. SenGupta, J. Traeger-Synodinos, K. Vesela, S. Viville, et al. ESHRE PGD Consortium data collection VI: cycles from January to December 2003 with pregnancy follow-up to October 2004 Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2007; 22(2): 323 - 336. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Donoso, C. Staessen, B.C.J.M. Fauser, and P. Devroey Current value of preimplantation genetic aneuploidy screening in IVF Hum. Reprod. Update, January 1, 2007; 13(1): 15 - 25. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Offit, M. Sagi, and K. Hurley Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis for Cancer Syndromes: A New Challenge for Preventive Medicine JAMA, December 13, 2006; 296(22): 2727 - 2730. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Fiorentino, A. Biricik, A. Nuccitelli, R. De Palma, S. Kahraman, M. Iacobelli, V. Trengia, D. Caserta, M.A. Bonu, A. Borini, et al. Strategies and clinical outcome of 250 cycles of Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis for single gene disorders Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2006; 21(3): 670 - 684. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.C. Harper, K. Boelaert, J. Geraedts, G. Harton, W.G. Kearns, C. Moutou, N. Muntjewerff, S. Repping, S. SenGupta, P.N. Scriven, et al. ESHRE PGD Consortium data collection V: Cycles from January to December 2002 with pregnancy follow-up to October 2003 Hum. Reprod., January 1, 2006; 21(1): 3 - 21. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. F. Sanchez-Garcia, J. Benet, C. Gutierrez-Mateo, J. Luis Seculi, E. Monros, and J. Navarro Multiple mutation analysis of the cystic fibrosis gene in single cells Mol. Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2005; 11(6): 463 - 468. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||






