Skip Navigation



Hum. Reprod. Advance Access published online on November 26, 2004

Human Reproduction, doi:10.1093/humrep/deh583
© 2004 by European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
20/1/307    most recent
deh583v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ngai, S. W.
Right arrow Articles by Ho, P. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ngai, S. W.
Right arrow Articles by Ho, P. C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Received June 1, 2004
Accepted October 2, 2004

Article

A randomized trial to compare 24 h versus 12 h double dose regimen of levonorgestrel for emergency contraception

Suk Wai Ngai 1*, Susan Fan 2, Shiqin Li 3, Linan Cheng 4, Juhong Ding 5, Xiaoping Jing 6, Ernest Hung Yu Ng 7, and Pak Chung Ho 1

1 Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Hong Kong, Queen Mary Hospital, 102 Pokfulam Road, Hong Kong SAR, China
2 MRCOG, Family Planning Association of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
3 Family Planning Association, Institute of Shenzhen, Hong Kong, China
4 Shanghai Institute of Family Planning Technical Institution, Hong Kong, China
5 Jiangsu Family Planning Institute, Hong Kong, China
6 Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, affiliated to Capital University of Medical Science, Hong Kong, China
7 Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
Suk Wai Ngai, E-mail: cora{at}hkucc.hku.hk


   Abstract

BACKGROUND: Levonorgestrel (0.75 mg given for two doses 12 h apart) has been proven to be an effective regimen for emergency contraception when the first dose is given within 72 h of unprotected coitus. However, the dosing interval is inconvenient for those taking the first dose in the afternoon. We conducted a randomized study to evaluate two levonorgestrel dosing regimens for emergency contraception. Two doses of levonorgestrel 0.75 mg were administered with the first dose given up to 120 h after unprotected intercourse. The second dose was given 12 h later in the first regimen and 24 h later in the second regimen. METHODS: We conducted a double-blind, randomized trial between 1997 and 2003 at five centres in China. A total of 2071 women requesting emergency contraception within 120 h of unprotected intercourse were recruited. They were randomized to receive two doses of 0.75 mg of levonorgestrel, given either 24 h apart or 12 h apart. RESULTS: Outcome was unknown for 53 women (24 in the 24 h group and 29 in the 12 h group). Among the remaining 2018 women, the crude pregnancy rate was 1.9% in the 24 h group [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.17-2.94] and 2.0% in the 12 h group (95% CI 1.19-2.99). The proportion of pregnancies prevented was estimated to be 72% in the 24 h group and 75% in the 12 h group. Side-effects were mild in both groups. The efficacy of the 12 h regimen declined significantly when there were further acts of intercourse after treatment (5.0 versus 1.0%, P<0.01). This was not observed in the 24 h group. CONCLUSIONS: Two doses of 0.75 mg levonorgestrel given either 24 or 12 h apart are effective for emergency contraception up to 120 h after unprotected intercourse. Further research to investigative more effective methods of emergency contraception is warranted.

Keywords: emergency contraception; levonorgestrel; pregnancy; randomized trial; unprotected intercourse.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
C.-X. Meng, K. Gemzell-Danielsson, O. Stephansson, J.-Z. Kang, Q.-F. Chen, and L.-N. Cheng
Emergency contraceptive use among 5677 women seeking abortion in Shanghai, China
Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2009; 24(7): 1612 - 1618.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CMAJHome page
W. A. Fisher and A. Black
Contraception in Canada: a review of method choices, characteristics, adherence and approaches to counselling
Can. Med. Assoc. J., March 27, 2007; 176(7): 953 - 961.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.