Hum. Reprod. Advance Access published online on December 9, 2004
Human Reproduction, doi:10.1093/humrep/deh663
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 Department of Reproductive Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of doubling the starting dose of gonadotrophins on the ovarian response in IVF patients with a low antral follicle count (AFC). METHODS: Fifty-two patients with an AFC of <5 follicles of 2-5 mm diameter before starting their first IVF cycle participated in this randomized controlled trial. They were randomized by opening a sealed envelope, receiving either 150 IU (group I, n=26) or 300 IU (group II, n=26) of rFSH as a starting dose. The main outcome measures of the study were number of oocytes, poor response (<4 oocytes at retrieval or cancellation due to insufficient follicle growth) and ongoing pregnancy (12 weeks of gestation). RESULTS: The groups were comparable regarding patient characteristics and outcome of the IVF treatment. The median number of oocytes collected was 3 for both groups (P=0.79). The difference in the mean number of oocytes was 0.3 oocytes in favour of group I (P=0.69). Sixty-five per cent of the patients in group I experienced a poor response and 62% in group II. The ongoing pregnancy rate was 8% in group I and 4% in group II (P=0.55). CONCLUSIONS: Expected poor response patients, defined as patients with an AFC <5, are not likely not to benefit from a higher starting dose of gonadotrophins in IVF. *Presented in part as an oral presentation at the 19th annual meeting of the ESHRE in Madrid, July 1, 2003.
Received January 5, 2004
Revised September 7, 2004
Accepted November 19, 2004
Article
Expected poor responders on the basis of an antral follicle count do not benefit from a higher starting dose of gonadotrophins in IVF treatment: a randomized controlled trial*
2 Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Dr Molewaterplein 50, 3015 GE Rotterdam, The Netherlands
E.R. Klinkert, E-mail: e.r.klinkert{at}azu.nl
![]()
Abstract ![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. La Marca, G. Sighinolfi, D. Radi, C. Argento, E. Baraldi, A. C. Artenisio, G. Stabile, and A. Volpe Anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) as a predictive marker in assisted reproductive technology (ART) Hum. Reprod. Update, September 30, 2009; (2009) dmp036v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. J. Broekmans, M. R. Soules, and B. C. Fauser Ovarian Aging: Mechanisms and Clinical Consequences Endocr. Rev., August 1, 2009; 30(5): 465 - 493. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Devroey, B.C.J.M. Fauser, K. Diedrich, and on behalf of the Evian Annual Reproduction (EVAR) Approaches to improve the diagnosis and management of infertility Hum. Reprod. Update, July 1, 2009; 15(4): 391 - 408. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Fabregues, J. Penarrubia, M. Creus, D. Manau, G. Casals, F. Carmona, and J. Balasch Transdermal testosterone may improve ovarian response to gonadotrophins in low-responder IVF patients: a randomized, clinical trial Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2009; 24(2): 349 - 359. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Gnoth, A.N. Schuring, K. Friol, J. Tigges, P. Mallmann, and E. Godehardt Relevance of anti-Mullerian hormone measurement in a routine IVF program Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2008; 23(6): 1359 - 1365. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T.E.M. Verhagen, D.J. Hendriks, L.F.J.M.M. Bancsi, B.W.J. Mol, and F.J.M. Broekmans The accuracy of multivariate models predicting ovarian reserve and pregnancy after in vitro fertilization: a meta-analysis Hum. Reprod. Update, March 1, 2008; 14(2): 95 - 100. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F.J. Broekmans, J. Kwee, D.J. Hendriks, B.W. Mol, and C.B. Lambalk A systematic review of tests predicting ovarian reserve and IVF outcome Hum. Reprod. Update, November 1, 2006; 12(6): 685 - 718. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Maheshwari, P. Fowler, and S. Bhattacharya Assessment of ovarian reserve--should we perform tests of ovarian reserve routinely? Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2006; 21(11): 2729 - 2735. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. S. Macklon, R. L. Stouffer, L. C. Giudice, and B. C. J. M. Fauser The Science behind 25 Years of Ovarian Stimulation for in Vitro Fertilization Endocr. Rev., April 1, 2006; 27(2): 170 - 207. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Friden, J. Hreinsson, and O. Hovatta Birth of a healthy infant after in vitro oocyte maturation and ICSI in a woman with diminished ovarian response: Case report Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2005; 20(9): 2556 - 2558. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. A. Lobo Potential Options for Preservation of Fertility in Women N. Engl. J. Med., July 7, 2005; 353(1): 64 - 73. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||



