Hum. Reprod. Advance Access published online on January 21, 2005
Human Reproduction, doi:10.1093/humrep/deh718
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 Institut Clínic of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Neonatology, Barcelona, Spain
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. BACKGROUND: Anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) has been recently proposed as a marker for ovarian ageing and poor ovarian response to controlled ovarian hyperstimulation in assisted reproduction cycles. The present study was undertaken to investigate the usefulness of baseline cycle day 3 AMH levels and AMH serum concentrations obtained on the fifth day of gonadotropin therapy in predicting ovarian response and pregnancy in women undergoing ovarian stimulation with FSH under pituitary desensitization for assisted reproduction. METHODS: A total of 80 women undergoing their first cycle of IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) treatment were studied. Twenty consecutive cycles which were cancelled because of a poor follicular response were initially selected. As a control group, 60 women were randomly selected from our assisted reproduction programme matching by race, age, body mass index, basal FSH and indication for IVF/ICSI to those in the cancelled group. For each cancelled patient, three IVF/ICSI women who met the matching criteria were included. RESULTS: Basal and day 5 AMH serum concentrations were significantly lower in the cancelled than in the control group. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analysis showed that the capacity of day 5 AMH in predicting the likelihood of cancellation in an assisted reproduction treatment programme was significantly higher than that for basal AMH measurement. However, the predictive capacity of day 5 AMH was not better than that provided by day 5 estradiol. In addition, neither basal nor day 5 AMH or estradiol measurements were useful in the prediction of pregnancy after assisted reproductive treatment. CONCLUSIONS: AMH concentrations obtained early in the follicular phase during ovarian stimulation under pituitary suppression for assisted reproduction are better predictors of ovarian response than basal AMH measurements. However, AMH is not useful in the prediction of pregnancy. Definite clinical applicability of AMH determination as a marker of IVF outcome remains to be established.
Received October 5, 2004
Accepted December 7, 2004
Article
Basal and stimulation day 5 anti-Müllerian hormone serum concentrations as predictors of ovarian response and pregnancy in assisted reproductive technology cycles stimulated with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist-gonadotropin treatment
2 Hormonal Laboratory, Faculty of Medicine-University of Barcelona, Hospital Clínic-Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
Juan Balasch, E-mail: jbalasch{at}ub.edu
Abstract 
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  A. La Marca, G. Sighinolfi, D. Radi, C. Argento, E. Baraldi, A. C. Artenisio, G. Stabile, and A. Volpe Anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) as a predictive marker in assisted reproductive technology (ART) Hum. Reprod. Update, September 30, 2009; (2009) dmp036v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. La Marca, F.J. Broekmans, A. Volpe, B.C. Fauser, N.S. Macklon, and on behalf of the ESHRE Special Interest Group for Anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH): what do we still need to know? Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2009; 24(9): 2264 - 2275. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. M. Nelson, R. W. Yates, H. Lyall, M. Jamieson, I. Traynor, M. Gaudoin, P. Mitchell, P. Ambrose, and R. Fleming Anti-Mullerian hormone-based approach to controlled ovarian stimulation for assisted conception Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2009; 24(4): 867 - 875. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C. Rico, S. Fabre, C. Medigue, N. d. Clemente, F. Clement, M. Bontoux, J.-L. Touze, M. Dupont, E. Briant, B. Remy, et al. Anti-Mullerian Hormone Is an Endocrine Marker of Ovarian Gonadotropin-Responsive Follicles and Can Help to Predict Superovulatory Responses in the Cow Biol Reprod, January 1, 2009; 80(1): 50 - 59. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. Jayaprakasan, B.K. Campbell, J.F. Hopkisson, J.S. Clewes, I.R. Johnson, and N.J. Raine-Fenning Effect of pituitary desensitization on the early growing follicular cohort estimated using anti-Mullerian hormone Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2008; 23(11): 2577 - 2583. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. van Disseldorp, M. J. Faddy, A. P. N. Themmen, F. H. de Jong, P. H. M. Peeters, Y. T. van der Schouw, and F. J. M. Broekmans Relationship of Serum Antimullerian Hormone Concentration to Age at Menopause J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., June 1, 2008; 93(6): 2129 - 2134. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T.-H. Lee, C.-H. Liu, C.-C. Huang, Y.-L. Wu, Y.-T. Shih, H.-N. Ho, Y.-S. Yang, and M.-S. Lee Serum anti-mullerian hormone and estradiol levels as predictors of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome in assisted reproduction technology cycles Hum. Reprod., January 1, 2008; 23(1): 160 - 167. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. Arbo, D.V. Vetori, M.F. Jimenez, F.M. Freitas, N. Lemos, and J.S. Cunha-Filho Serum anti-mullerian hormone levels and follicular cohort characteristics after pituitary suppression in the late luteal phase with oral contraceptive pills Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2007; 22(12): 3192 - 3196. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. M. Nelson, R. W. Yates, and R. Fleming Serum anti-Mullerian hormone and FSH: prediction of live birth and extremes of response in stimulated cycles implications for individualization of therapy Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2007; 22(9): 2414 - 2421. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. Fanchin, D. H. Mendez Lozano, N. Frydman, A. Gougeon, N. di Clemente, R. Frydman, and J. Taieb Anti-Mullerian Hormone Concentrations in the Follicular Fluid of the Preovulatory Follicle Are Predictive of the Implantation Potential of the Ensuing Embryo Obtained by in Vitro Fertilization J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., May 1, 2007; 92(5): 1796 - 1802. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. La Marca, S. Giulini, A. Tirelli, E. Bertucci, T. Marsella, S. Xella, and A. Volpe Anti-Mullerian hormone measurement on any day of the menstrual cycle strongly predicts ovarian response in assisted reproductive technology Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2007; 22(3): 766 - 771. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
F.J. Broekmans, J. Kwee, D.J. Hendriks, B.W. Mol, and C.B. Lambalk A systematic review of tests predicting ovarian reserve and IVF outcome Hum. Reprod. Update, November 1, 2006; 12(6): 685 - 718. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Al-Qahtani and N. P. Groome Anti-Mullerian Hormone: Cinderella Finds New Admirers. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., October 1, 2006; 91(10): 3760 - 3762. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
W. J. K. Hehenkamp, C. W. N. Looman, A. P. N. Themmen, F. H. de Jong, E. R. te Velde, and F. J. M. Broekmans Anti-Mullerian Hormone Levels in the Spontaneous Menstrual Cycle Do Not Show Substantial Fluctuation J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., October 1, 2006; 91(10): 4057 - 4063. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D. Modi, D. Bhartiya, and C. Puri Developmental expression and cellular distribution of Mullerian inhibiting substance in the primate ovary. Reproduction, September 1, 2006; 132(3): 443 - 453. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. Ebner, M. Sommergruber, M. Moser, O. Shebl, E. Schreier-Lechner, and G. Tews Basal level of anti-Mullerian hormone is associated with oocyte quality in stimulated cycles Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2006; 21(8): 2022 - 2026. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Balasch, F. Fabregues, J. Penarrubia, F. Carmona, R. Casamitjana, M. Creus, D. Manau, G. Casals, and J. A. Vanrell Pretreatment with transdermal testosterone may improve ovarian response to gonadotrophins in poor-responder IVF patients with normal basal concentrations of FSH Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2006; 21(7): 1884 - 1893. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. A Visser, F. H de Jong, J. S E Laven, and A. P N Themmen Anti-Mullerian hormone: a new marker for ovarian function Reproduction, January 1, 2006; 131(1): 1 - 9. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. Eldar-Geva, A. Ben-Chetrit, I. M. Spitz, R. Rabinowitz, E. Markowitz, T. Mimoni, M. Gal, E. Zylber-Haran, and E. J. Margalioth Dynamic assays of inhibin B, anti-Mullerian hormone and estradiol following FSH stimulation and ovarian ultrasonography as predictors of IVF outcome Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2005; 20(11): 3178 - 3183. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|