Skip Navigation



Hum. Reprod. Advance Access published online on April 7, 2005
Human Reproduction, doi:10.1093/humrep/dei011
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
20/8/2224    most recent
dei011v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ragni, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ragni, G.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oupjournals.org
Received December 29, 2004
Revised March 1, 2005
Accepted March 8, 2005

Article

The 2004 Italian legislation regulating assisted reproduction technology: a multicentre survey on the results of IVF cycles

G. Ragni 1*, A. Allegra 2, P. Anserini 3, F. Causio 4, A.P. Ferraretti 5, E. Greco 6, R. Palermo 7, E. Somigliana 1, and on behalf of the Società Italiana della Riproduzione (S.I.d.R.) study group on the impact of the law 40/2004 *

1 Infertility Unit, ‘Policlinico-L. Mangiagalli’ Hospital, Milano, Italy
2 Reproductive Medicine Unit, ANDROS Day Surgery, Palermo (Palermo I), Italy
3 Department of Obstetrics-Gynecology, San Martino Hospital, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
4 Centro Medico San Luca, Bari, Italy
5 S.I.S.ME.R., Reproductive Medicine Unit, Bologna, Italy
6 Medicina della Riproduzione Umana, European Hospital, Roma, Italy and
7 A.M.B.R.A., Associazione Medici e Biologi per la Riproduzione Assistita, Palermo (Palermo II), Italy

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
G. Ragni, E-mail: g.ragni{at}icp.mi.it


  Abstract

BACKGROUND: The new Italian law, passed in 2004, regulating assisted reproduction technology imposes that no more than three oocytes can be fertilized at one time and that all embryos obtained must be transferred simultaneously. Oocyte cryopreservation is allowed while embryo cryostorage is banned. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical impact of these limitations. METHODS: Seven Italian infertility centres were invited to collect data on IVF cycles performed over the first 4 months of application of the new legislation. As a control, all centres provided data on cycles performed in the same solar period, 1 year before. RESULTS: Data from 1861 cycles were obtained, 961 in the pre-law period and 900 in the post-law period. Pregnancy rate per oocyte retrieval and rate of multiple pregnancies in the pre- and post-law periods were 27.0 and 24.2% (P=0.18) and 25.8 and 20.9% (P=0.11) respectively. However, the prohibition to freeze embryos does appear to have markedly reduced the cumulative rate of success. CONCLUSIONS: The rate of success of IVF-ICSI cycles using fresh embryos is not significantly influenced by the new legislation while the prohibition to freeze embryos seems to result in a more relevant impact.

Keywords: embryo transfer; IVF; legislation.

* Collaborators in the Società Italiana della Riproduzione (S.I.d.R.) study group on the impact of the law 40/2004 were: I.Caliari and A.E.Nicolosi (Infertility Unit, Regina Elena Hospital, Milano); F.Sammartano and A.Volpes (Reproductive Medicine Unit, ANDROS Day Surgery, Palermo); P.Lanera (Department of Obstetrics-Gynecology, San Martino Hospital, University of Genova, Genova); E.Sarcina (Centro Medico San Luca, Bari); A.D'Angelo and M.Toschi (S.I.S.ME.R., Reproductive Medicine Unit, Bologna); L.Rienzi and F.Ubaldi (Medicina della Riproduzione Umana, European Hospital, Roma); R.Ciriminna, V.Agrifoglio and P.Napoli (A.M.B.R.A., Associazione Medici e Biologi per la Riproduzione Assistita, Palermo).


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
The ESHRE Capri Workshop Group
Intrauterine insemination
Hum. Reprod. Update, May 1, 2009; 15(3): 265 - 277.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Reproductive SciencesHome page
A. Paffoni, F. Alagna, E. Somigliana, L. Restelli, T. A. L. Brevini, F. Gandolfi, and G. Ragni
Developmental Potential of Human Oocytes After Slow Freezing or Vitrification: A Randomized In Vitro Study Based on Parthenogenesis
Reproductive Sciences, December 1, 2008; 15(10): 1027 - 1033.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 ReproductionHome page
F. Cillo, T. A L Brevini, S. Antonini, A. Paffoni, G. Ragni, and F. Gandolfi
Association between human oocyte developmental competence and expression levels of some cumulus genes
Reproduction, November 1, 2007; 134(5): 645 - 650.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Hum ReprodHome page
R. Ciriminna, M.L. Papale, P.G. Artini, M. Costa, L. De Santis, L. Gandini, L. Parmegiani, G. Ragni, A. Revelli, L. Rienzi, et al.
Impact of Italian legislation regulating assisted reproduction techniques on ICSI outcomes in severe male factor infertility: a multicentric survey
Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2007; 22(9): 2481 - 2487.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Hum ReprodHome page
M. Legge, R. Fitzgerald, and N. Frank
A retrospective study of New Zealand case law involving assisted reproduction technology and the social recognition of 'new' family
Hum. Reprod., January 1, 2007; 22(1): 17 - 25.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Hum ReprodHome page
E.C. Haagen, R.P.M.G. Hermens, W.L.D.M. Nelen, D.D.M. Braat, R.P.T.M. Grol, and J.A.M. Kremer
Subfertility guidelines in Europe: the quantity and quality of intrauterine insemination guidelines
Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2006; 21(8): 2103 - 2109.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Hum ReprodHome page
N. Gleicher, A. Weghofer, and D. Barad
A formal comparison of the practice of assisted reproductive technologies between Europe and the USA
Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2006; 21(8): 1945 - 1950.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Hum ReprodHome page
E. Greco, F. Ubaldi, L. Rienzi, M. Iacobelli, S. Ferrero, G. Minasi, S. Romano, C. Litwicka, and J. Tesarik
Limiting the number of injected oocytes to three impairs ICSI outcomes in patients with nonobstructive azoospermia
Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2006; 21(6): 1521 - 1524.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Hum ReprodHome page
S. Palomba, T. Russo, A. Falbo, F. Orio Jr, F. Manguso, E. Nelaj, A. Tolino, A. Colao, B. Dale, and F. Zullo
Clinical use of the perifollicular vascularity assessment in IVF cycles: a pilot study
Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2006; 21(4): 1055 - 1061.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Hum ReprodHome page
P.E. Levi Setti, E. Albani, P.V. Novara, A. Cesana, and G. Morreale
Cryopreservation of supernumerary oocytes in IVF/ICSI cycles
Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2006; 21(2): 370 - 375.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.