Hum. Reprod. Advance Access published online on June 24, 2005
Human Reproduction, doi:10.1093/humrep/dei157
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam; Center for Reproductive Medicine, Academic Medical Center; Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Vrije Universiteit Medical Center, Amsterdam ; Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Máxima Medical Center, Veldhoven, The Netherlands
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. The current approach of the basic fertility work-up has been questioned recently in this journal. Based on new data on human fecundity, the authors advocated starting the fertility work-up after just 6 months of trying to conceive instead of the usual 12 months. In women younger than 39 years and with a regular cycle, there are several arguments why the basic fertility work-up should not be done earlier than after 12 months of child wish. Firstly, 50% of couples who have tried to conceive for 6 months without success will conceive in the next 6 months without any treatment. Secondly, the prevalence of fertility diseases is lower in couples who have been trying to conceive for 6 months as compared with those who have been trying for 12 months. Performance of a fertility work-up at this stage will lead to an increase in false-positive diagnoses compared with performing them at 12 months of subfertility. Thirdly, fertility treatment will have fewer additional effects in couples with good spontaneous conception prospects (6-12 months child wish), compared with subfertile couples who have poor prospects. At present, none of the available fertility treatments have success rates comparable with no intervention in these women, and postponement of treatment in such couples will prevent complications such as ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome and multiple pregnancies. We argue that the fertility work-up should not be offered to couples with a duration of child wish of <12 months, except for women with ovulation disorders and women of 39 years and older.
Received March 24, 2005
Revised May 4, 2005
Accepted May 10, 2005
Article
DEBATE--continued
2 Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam; Center for Reproductive Medicine, Academic Medical Center; Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Vrije Universiteit Medical Center, Amsterdam
3 Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Vrije Universiteit Medical Center, Amsterdam
4 Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam
5 Center for Reproductive Medicine, Academic Medical Center
6 Center for Reproductive Medicine, Academic Medical Center; Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Máxima Medical Center, Veldhoven, The Netherlands
Jan W. van der Steeg, E-mail: j.w.vandersteeg{at}amc.nl
![]()
Abstract ![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Bhasin Approach to the Infertile Man J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., June 1, 2007; 92(6): 1995 - 2004. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
