Hum. Reprod. Advance Access published online on August 19, 2005
Human Reproduction, doi:10.1093/humrep/dei203
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 IVF Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shaare-Zedek Medical Center, Ben Gurion University of the Negev, Jerusalem 91031, Israel; Institute of Hormone Research, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shaare-Zedek Medical Center, Ben Gurion University of the Negev, Jerusalem 91031, Israel
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. BACKGROUND: We evaluated basal and dynamic hormonal markers [(FSH, inhibin B, estradiol and anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH)] during the follicular phase and luteal phase of the menstrual cycle and ultrasonic ovarian morphology as predictors of IVF outcome. METHODS: Fifty-six women, aged <38 years, with normal day 3 FSH levels were included prospectively. Serum estradiol, inhibin B and AMH were measured before and 24 h after administration of 300 IU of recombinant FSH on cycle day 3-4 and during the luteal phase. Ovarian volume and antral follicle count (AFC) were evaluated on cycle day 3-4. The predictive value of oocyte number and pregnancy were assessed using uni- and multivariate analysis. RESULTS:Poor responders (<6 oocytes) had significantly lower luteal AMH levels, while high responders (>20 oocytes) had significantly higher AFC, AMH and luteal stimulated inhibin B and estradiol than normal responders. Multivariate regression analyses showed that the best models for predicting oocyte number included AFC, follicular phase AMH and stimulated inhibin B. Only AMH showed a significant difference between pregnant and non-pregnant women at both cycle phases. CONCLUSIONS: In young women (<38 years), AFC or basal AMH and stimulated inhibin B predict ovarian response for IVF. The only predictor for pregnancy is follicular or luteal phase AMH.
Received April 8, 2005
Revised June 6, 2005
Accepted June 14, 2005
Article
Dynamic assays of inhibin B, anti-Mullerian hormone and estradiol following FSH stimulation and ovarian ultrasonography as predictors of IVF outcome
2 IVF Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shaare-Zedek Medical Center, Ben Gurion University of the Negev, Jerusalem 91031, Israel
3 Institute of Hormone Research, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shaare-Zedek Medical Center, Ben Gurion University of the Negev, Jerusalem 91031, Israel
4 Ultrasound Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shaare-Zedek Medical Center, Ben Gurion University of the Negev, Jerusalem 91031, Israel
Talia Eldar-Geva, E-mail: gevat{at}szmc.org.il
![]()
Abstract ![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. La Marca, G. Sighinolfi, D. Radi, C. Argento, E. Baraldi, A. C. Artenisio, G. Stabile, and A. Volpe Anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) as a predictive marker in assisted reproductive technology (ART) Hum. Reprod. Update, September 30, 2009; (2009) dmp036v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. La Marca, F.J. Broekmans, A. Volpe, B.C. Fauser, N.S. Macklon, and on behalf of the ESHRE Special Interest Group for Anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH): what do we still need to know? Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2009; 24(9): 2264 - 2275. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. J. Broekmans, M. R. Soules, and B. C. Fauser Ovarian Aging: Mechanisms and Clinical Consequences Endocr. Rev., August 1, 2009; 30(5): 465 - 493. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Lie Fong, J.S.E. Laven, F.G.A.J. Hakvoort-Cammel, I. Schipper, J.A. Visser, A.P.N. Themmen, F.H. de Jong, and M.M. van den Heuvel-Eibrink Assessment of ovarian reserve in adult childhood cancer survivors using anti-Mullerian hormone Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2009; 24(4): 982 - 990. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Rico, S. Fabre, C. Medigue, N. d. Clemente, F. Clement, M. Bontoux, J.-L. Touze, M. Dupont, E. Briant, B. Remy, et al. Anti-Mullerian Hormone Is an Endocrine Marker of Ovarian Gonadotropin-Responsive Follicles and Can Help to Predict Superovulatory Responses in the Cow Biol Reprod, January 1, 2009; 80(1): 50 - 59. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Jayaprakasan, B.K. Campbell, J.F. Hopkisson, J.S. Clewes, I.R. Johnson, and N.J. Raine-Fenning Effect of pituitary desensitization on the early growing follicular cohort estimated using anti-Mullerian hormone Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2008; 23(11): 2577 - 2583. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. van Disseldorp, M. J. Faddy, A. P. N. Themmen, F. H. de Jong, P. H. M. Peeters, Y. T. van der Schouw, and F. J. M. Broekmans Relationship of Serum Antimullerian Hormone Concentration to Age at Menopause J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., June 1, 2008; 93(6): 2129 - 2134. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Arbo, D.V. Vetori, M.F. Jimenez, F.M. Freitas, N. Lemos, and J.S. Cunha-Filho Serum anti-mullerian hormone levels and follicular cohort characteristics after pituitary suppression in the late luteal phase with oral contraceptive pills Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2007; 22(12): 3192 - 3196. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. M. Nelson, R. W. Yates, and R. Fleming Serum anti-Mullerian hormone and FSH: prediction of live birth and extremes of response in stimulated cycles implications for individualization of therapy Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2007; 22(9): 2414 - 2421. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Tsepelidis, F. Devreker, I. Demeestere, A. Flahaut, Ch. Gervy, and Y. Englert Stable serum levels of anti-Mullerian hormone during the menstrual cycle: a prospective study in normo-ovulatory women Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2007; 22(7): 1837 - 1840. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Fanchin, D. H. Mendez Lozano, N. Frydman, A. Gougeon, N. di Clemente, R. Frydman, and J. Taieb Anti-Mullerian Hormone Concentrations in the Follicular Fluid of the Preovulatory Follicle Are Predictive of the Implantation Potential of the Ensuing Embryo Obtained by in Vitro Fertilization J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., May 1, 2007; 92(5): 1796 - 1802. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. La Marca, S. Giulini, A. Tirelli, E. Bertucci, T. Marsella, S. Xella, and A. Volpe Anti-Mullerian hormone measurement on any day of the menstrual cycle strongly predicts ovarian response in assisted reproductive technology Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2007; 22(3): 766 - 771. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Maheshwari, P. Fowler, and S. Bhattacharya Assessment of ovarian reserve--should we perform tests of ovarian reserve routinely? Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2006; 21(11): 2729 - 2735. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Ebner, M. Sommergruber, M. Moser, O. Shebl, E. Schreier-Lechner, and G. Tews Basal level of anti-Mullerian hormone is associated with oocyte quality in stimulated cycles Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2006; 21(8): 2022 - 2026. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||




