Skip Navigation



Hum. Reprod. Advance Access published online on September 19, 2005

Human Reproduction, doi:10.1093/humrep/dei265
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
20/12/3402    most recent
dei265v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Liu, X.-Y.
Right arrow Articles by Tan, J.-H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Liu, X.-Y.
Right arrow Articles by Tan, J.-H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved.
Received April 22, 2005
Revised July 9, 2005
Accepted July 19, 2005

Article

Cortical granules behave differently in mouse oocytes matured under different conditions

Xin-Yong Liu 1, Suo-Feng Mal 1, De-Qiang Miao 1, Dong-Jun Liu 2, Shorgan Bao 2, and Jing-He Tan 1*

1 Laboratory for Animal Reproduction and Embryology, College of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai-an City 271018, Shandong Province, People’s Republic of China
2 Research Center for Laboratory Animal Science, Inner Mongolia University, Huhhot 010021

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
Jing-He Tan, E-mail: tanjh{at}sdau.edu.cn


   Abstract

BACKGROUND: To better understand the differences between in vivo (IVO) and in vitro (IVM) matured oocytes, we studied the chronological changes in cortical granule (CG) distribution and nuclear progression during maturation, and the competence of CG release and embryo development of mouse oocytes matured under different conditions. METHODS: Oocytes matured in vivo or in different culture media were used and CG distribution and release were assessed by fluorescein isothiocyanate-labelled Lens culinaris agglutinin and laser confocal microscopy. RESULTS: Tempos of nuclear maturation and CG redistribution were slower, and competence for CG exocytosis, cleavage and blastulation were lower in the IVM oocytes than in the IVO oocytes. These parameters also differed among oocytes matured in different culture media. Hypoxanthine (HX, 4 mM) blocked germinal vesicle breakdown (GVBD), postponed CG migration and prevented CG-free domain (CGFD) formation. Cycloheximide (CHX) facilitated both GVBD and CG migration, but inhibited CGFD formation. The presence of serum in maturation media enhanced CG release after aging or activation of oocytes. Maintenance of germinal vesicle intact for some time by a trace amount (0.18 mM) of HX was beneficial to oocyte cytoplasmic maturation. CONCLUSION: CGs behaved differently in mouse oocytes matured under different conditions, and cytoplasmic maturity was not fully achieved in the IVM oocytes.

Keywords: activation/cortical granule/in vitro maturation/mouse oocyte.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ReproductionHome page
N. Liu, Y.-G. Wu, G.-C. Lan, H.-S. Sui, L. Ge, J.-Z. Wang, Y. Liu, T.-W. Qiao, and J.-H. Tan
Pyruvate prevents aging of mouse oocytes
Reproduction, August 1, 2009; 138(2): 223 - 234.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ReproductionHome page
J.-Z. Wang, H.-S. Sui, D.-Q. Miao, N. Liu, P. Zhou, L. Ge, and J.-H. Tan
Effects of heat stress during in vitro maturation on cytoplasmic versus nuclear components of mouse oocytes
Reproduction, February 1, 2009; 137(2): 181 - 189.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.