Skip Navigation



Hum. Reprod. Advance Access published online on December 16, 2005

Human Reproduction, doi:10.1093/humrep/dei427
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
21/4/976    most recent
dei427v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hatakeyama, C.
Right arrow Articles by Ma, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hatakeyama, C.
Right arrow Articles by Ma, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org
Received September 13, 2005
Revised November 7, 2005
Accepted November 15, 2005

Article

Meiotic segregation patterns and ICSI pregnancy outcome of a rare (13;21) Robertsonian translocation carrier: a case report

C. Hatakeyama 1, H. Gao 1, K. Harmer 1, and S. Ma 1 *

1 Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
S. Ma, E-mail: sai{at}interchange.ubc.ca


   Abstract

t(13;21) is an uncommon Robertsonian translocation (RT) with limited information in the literature. Hereby, we assessed the meiotic segregation and interchromosomal effect (ICE) in sperm nuclei from a t(13;21) carrier. The pregnancy outcome following ICSI was also included as reference for physicians and patients. Dual-colour fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) was carried out to analyse the segregation pattern of chromosomes 13 and 21, while triple-colour FISH was used to investigate the possible concurrence of ICE. With respect to chromosomal constitutions of 13 and 21, 88.39% of the spermatozoa were normal or balanced due to alternative segregations, and 11.08% showed nullisomy or disomy as a result of adjacent segregations. However, for chromosome 18 and sex chromosomes, the proportion of normal haploids was 98.79%. The rate of disomy was not significantly higher than the controls for either chromosome 18 or X/Y. The rare t(13;21) case exhibited a similar pattern of meiotic segregation as in the common RTs. ICEs were not observed in the current case.

Keywords: ICSI/interchromosomal effects/meiotic segregation/Robertsonian translocations/spermatozoa.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
G. Kirkpatrick, K. A. Ferguson, H. Gao, S. Tang, V. Chow, B. H. Yuen, and S. Ma
A comparison of sperm aneuploidy rates between infertile men with normal and abnormal karyotypes
Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2008; 23(7): 1679 - 1683.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
R.H. Martin
Cytogenetic determinants of male fertility
Hum. Reprod. Update, June 4, 2008; (2008) dmn017v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
E. Anton, F. Vidal, and J. Blanco
Role of sperm FISH studies in the genetic reproductive advice of structural reorganization carriers
Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2007; 22(8): 2088 - 2092.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.