Skip Navigation



Hum. Reprod. Advance Access published online on January 12, 2006
Human Reproduction, doi:10.1093/humrep/dei467
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
21/5/1110    most recent
dei467v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chwalisz, B.
Right arrow Articles by Kennedy, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chwalisz, B.
Right arrow Articles by Kennedy, S.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org
Received June 6, 2005
Revised October 7, 2005
Accepted October 18, 2005

Opinion

Prioritizing IVF patients according to the number of existing children--a proposed refinement to the current guideline

Bart Chwalisz 1, Enda McVeigh 1, Tony Hope 2, and Stephen Kennedy 1 *

1 Nuffield Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
2 The Ethox Centre, Division of Public Health & Primary Care, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
Stephen Kennedy, E-mail: stephen.kennedy{at}obs-gyn.ox.ac.uk


  Abstract

The National Health Service is poised to offer at least one cycle of IVF treatment to couples free of charge in the UK, provided that certain clinical criteria are met. At a local level, therefore, funders are faced with the problem of prioritizing patients and establishing waiting lists. It is generally accepted that preference should be given to those with the ‘greatest need’, but it is uncertain what the criterion is for greatest need. We propose two recommendations as a modification to the current guideline that stresses the need to favour ‘couples who do not have any children living with them’. First, we suggest that parental responsibility rather than shared residence be used as a criterion for eligibility. Second, we present a need-based approach that can be used coherently to distribute publicly funded treatment. In an attempt to achieve a fair way of prioritizing patients, we make distinctions between different family arrangements, based on the number of existing children. Our approach treats like cases alike, and ranks different cases relative to each other in a manner that is equitable and charitable.

Keywords: children/ethics/in-vitro fertilization.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.