Hum. Reprod. Advance Access published online on March 20, 2006
Human Reproduction, doi:10.1093/humrep/del073
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 Tecnobios Procreazione, Bologna
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. BACKGROUND: Recently described slow-cooling cryopreservation protocols involving elevated sucrose concentration have improved survival frequencies of human oocytes, potentially overcoming a major hurdle that has limited the adoption of oocyte storage. Because implantation rates of embryos from frozen oocytes remain generally low, it is still debated whether, irrespective of survival rates, this form of cryopreservation leads inevitably to the disruption or complete loss of the metaphase II (MII) spindle. METHODS: Human oocytes with an extruded polar body I (PBI) were cryopreserved using a slow-cooling method including 1.5 mol/l propane-1,2-diol (PrOH) and alternative sucrose concentrations (either 0.1 or 0.3 mol/l) in the freezing solution. Fresh control and frozen-thawed survived oocytes were analysed by confocal microscopy to evaluate MII spindle and chromosome organizations. RESULTS: Of the 104 oocytes included in the unfrozen group, 76 (73.1%) displayed normal bipolar spindles with equatorially aligned chromosomes. Spindle and chromatin organizations were significantly affected (50.8%) after cryopreservation involving lower sucrose concentration (61 oocytes), whereas these parameters were unchanged (69.7%) using the 0.3 mol/l sucrose protocol (152 oocytes). CONCLUSIONS: Partial disruption of the MII spindle and associated chromosomes accompanies inadequate cryopreservation during slow cooling. However, protocols adopting higher sucrose concentration in the freezing solution promote the retention of an intact chromosome segregation apparatus comparable in incidence to freshly collected oocytes.
Received December 7, 2005
Revised February 11, 2006
Accepted February 15, 2006
Article
Sucrose concentration influences the rate of human oocytes with normal spindle and chromosome configurations after slow-cooling cryopreservation
G. Coticchio 1 *,
L.De Santis 2,
G. Rossi 3,
A. Borini 1,
D. Albertini 4,
G. Scaravelli 5,
C. Alecci 6,
V. Bianchi 1,
S. Nottola 7,
and
S. Cecconi 3
2 Vita-Salute University, H.S.Raffaele, Milan
3 University of L’Aquila, L’Aquila
4 University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS
5 National Health Institute, Rome
6 UMR - Associazione HERA, Catania
7 ‘La Sapienza’ University, Rome, Italy
G. Coticchio, E-mail: coticchio{at}tecnobiosprocreazione.it
![]()
Abstract ![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J.J. Bromfield, G. Coticchio, K. Hutt, R. Sciajno, A. Borini, and D.F. Albertini Meiotic spindle dynamics in human oocytes following slow-cooling cryopreservation Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2009; 24(9): 2114 - 2123. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Shanshan Gao, Yuan Li, Xuan Gao, Jingmei Hu, Huijun Yang, and Z.-J. Chen Spindle and Chromosome Changes of Human MII Oocytes During Incubation After Slow Freezing/Fast Thawing Procedures Reproductive Sciences, April 1, 2009; 16(4): 391 - 396. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Eroglu, S. E. Bailey, M. Toner, and T. L. Toth Successful Cryopreservation of Mouse Oocytes by Using Low Concentrations of Trehalose and Dimethylsulfoxide Biol Reprod, January 1, 2009; 80(1): 70 - 78. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. De Santis, G. Coticchio, S. Paynter, D. Albertini, K. Hutt, I. Cino, M. Iaccarino, A. Gambardella, C. Flamigni, and A. Borini Permeability of human oocytes to ethylene glycol and their survival and spindle configurations after slow cooling cryopreservation Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2007; 22(10): 2776 - 2783. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S.A. Nottola, G. Macchiarelli, G. Coticchio, S. Bianchi, S. Cecconi, L. De Santis, G. Scaravelli, C. Flamigni, and A. Borini Ultrastructure of human mature oocytes after slow cooling cryopreservation using different sucrose concentrations Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2007; 22(4): 1123 - 1133. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||


