Hum. Reprod. Advance Access published online on March 16, 2006
Human Reproduction, doi:10.1093/humrep/del078
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 Faculty of Psychology, Department of Personality, Evaluation and Psychological Treatment, UNED University, Madrid and Department of Clinical Psychology, Clinica Bella Medica, Altea, Spain
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. In the past few decades, new and more efficient techniques to help solve fertility problems have become widely available throughout the developed world. These techniques include hormonal stimulation, ICSI, gamete intra-Fallopian transfer (GIFT) and IVF, and their cost is, on average, considerable. There is substantial initial evidence that the psychological disposition of the parents-to-be influences their fertility and thus the outcome of fertilization techniques. Many fertility treatments include consultation with a psychologist and do try to keep the stress produced by the treatment itself to a minimum, using concurrent therapy. However, the accumulating evidence points to the need to program medical fertility treatment, bearing in mind both chronic and acute stress levels, and to treat for their reduction before commencing the (actual) fertility treatment. There is ample evidence that lower stress levels mean better female and male natural fertility, though there is as yet no conclusive experimental evidence that lower stress levels result in better fertility treatment outcome. However, first reducing stress may diminish the number of treatment cycles needed before pregnancy is obtained, may prepare the couple for an initial failure of treatment or even make the more invasive techniques unnecessary. Primary psychological treatment for trait and state stress, being a less invasive method than IVF, ICSI or GIFT, is to be applied whenever indicated. Also, treatment and therapy to reduce stress, and in so doing enhance fertility, do not provoke the ethical and religious objections raised by infertility treatments.
Received November 15, 2005
Revised February 20, 2006
Accepted February 22, 2006
Opinion
Should fertilization treatment start with reducing stress?
Daniel M.Campagne 1 *
Daniel M.Campagne, E-mail: danplaton{at}hotmail.com
Abstract 
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  S. Dyer, C. Lombard, and Z. Van der Spuy Psychological distress among men suffering from couple infertility in South Africa: a quantitative assessment Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2009; 24(11): 2821 - 2826. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 E. D. Kirby, A. C. Geraghty, T. Ubuka, G. E. Bentley, and D. Kaufer Stress increases putative gonadotropin inhibitory hormone and decreases luteinizing hormone in male rats PNAS, July 7, 2009; 106(27): 11324 - 11329. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A.M.E. Lintsen, C.M. Verhaak, M.J.C. Eijkemans, J.M.J. Smeenk, and D.D.M. Braat Anxiety and depression have no influence on the cancellation and pregnancy rates of a first IVF or ICSI treatment Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2009; 24(5): 1092 - 1098. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. Kondoh, T. Okamoto, T. Higuchi, K. Tatsumi, T. Baba, S. K. Murphy, K. Takakura, I. Konishi, and S. Fujii Stress affects uterine receptivity through an ovarian-independent pathway Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2009; 24(4): 945 - 953. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|