Hum. Reprod. Advance Access published online on June 30, 2006
Human Reproduction, doi:10.1093/humrep/del093
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 Department of Gynecology, São Paulo, Brazil
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. BACKGROUND: The impact of hyperprolactinaemia on endometrial function, along with embryo implantation, has been the subject of discussion. This article examines whether experimental hyperprolactinaemia can affect mouse ovarian function, endometrial pinopodes and embryo implantation. METHODS: For pinopode analysis, 60 female mice were randomly divided into two groups: control (vehicle) and experimental [metoclopramide (MCP) 200 µg per day]. Injections were given subcutaneously for 50 days, and then, normally cycling females were housed with male mice for copulation during proestrus. The animals were killed on the fifth day following coitus when the antimes-ometrium portions of the uterine horns were removed for endometrial analysis. Blood was collected for prolactin (PRL) determination. In the second experiment, 60 female mice were used to evaluate the ovarian function by measuring estrogen and progesterone levels and counting luteal bodies and oocytes in the oviduct and uterus during estrus. RESULTS: The highest pregnancy rates and the largest population of pinopodes were both found in the vehicle group (P < 0.01). Estrogen and progesterone levels in MCP-treated mice were lower than those in control mice (P < 0.05). Also, the number of implantations was significantly lower in the MCP-treated group compared with the vehicle group after embryo transfer (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: PRL seems to have suppressive effects on ovarian function and the number of pinopodes; conceivably, hyperprolactinaemia has a negative effect on mouse embryo implantation. * Both authors contributed equally to this study.
Received December 13, 2005
Revised February 24, 2006
Accepted March 3, 2006
Article
Metoclopramide-induced hyperprolactinaemia caused marked decline in pinopodes and pregnancy rates in mice
Michele Quarante Panzan 1 *,
José Maria Soares Júnior 1 *,
Eduardo Leme Alves da Motta 1,
Edna Freymuller Haapalainen 2,
Manuel de Jesus Simões 2,
Heloisa Allegro Baptista 3,
Mauro Abi Haidar 1,
and
Edmund C. Baracat 1 *
2 Department of Morphology, São Paulo, Brazil
3 CEDEME, The Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
Edmund C. Baracat, E-mail: baracat.gineco{at}epm.br
![]()
Abstract ![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C.E. Quinn and R.F. Casper Pinopodes: a questionable role in endometrial receptivity Hum. Reprod. Update, March 1, 2009; 15(2): 229 - 236. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Shao, M. Nutu, B. Weijdegard, E. Egecioglu, J. Fernandez-Rodriguez, E. Tallet, V. Goffin, C. Ling, and H. Billig Differences in Prolactin Receptor (PRLR) in Mouse and Human Fallopian Tubes: Evidence for Multiple Regulatory Mechanisms Controlling PRLR Isoform Expression in Mice Biol Reprod, October 1, 2008; 79(4): 748 - 757. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||

