Hum. Reprod. Advance Access published online on May 9, 2006
Human Reproduction, doi:10.1093/humrep/del134
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 Fertility Centre, Malmö University Hospital, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden; Andrology Laboratory, Riga Stradins University, Riga, Latvia
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. BACKGROUND: Sperm DNA integrity is an important factor in the prognosis of male fertility. In this study, we investigated intra-individual variation of sperm chromatin structure assay (SCSA) parameters in infertility patients undergoing assisted reproductive techniques (ARTs). METHODS: Retrospective study of 282 consecutive patients referred for ART [intrauterine insemination (IUI), IVF or ICSI] with repeated (between 2 and 5) SCSA measurements. RESULTS: Mean coefficient of variation (CV) of DNA Fragmentation Index (DFI) for repeated SCSA measurements was 29%. A high proportion [37%; 95% confidence interval (CI): 27%, 49%] of patients with DFI >30% in the first test had DFI <30% in the second test. Also, a considerable proportion (27%; 95% CI : 16%, 40%) of patients with 21-30% DFI values in the first test had DFI >30% in the second test. CONCLUSIONS: Intra-individual variability in DFI is significant, therefore repeated SCSA measurements are recommended. The biological mechanisms behind these variations remain to be elucidated.
Received November 8, 2005
Revised April 4, 2006
Accepted April 7, 2006
Article
Intra-individual variation in sperm chromatin structure assay parameters in men from infertile couples: clinical implications
J. Erenpreiss 1 *,
M. Bungum 2,
M. Spano 3,
S. Elzanaty 4,
J. Orbidans 5,
and
A. Giwercman 4
2 Fertility Centre, Malmö University Hospital, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden; Fertility Clinic, Viborg Hospital (Skive), Skive, Denmark
3 Section of Toxicology and Biomedical Sciences, BIOTEC-MED, ENEA CR Casaccia, Rome, Italy
4 Fertility Centre, Malmö University Hospital, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
5 Andrology Laboratory, Riga Stradins University, Riga, Latvia
J. Erenpreiss, E-mail: juris.erenpreiss{at}med.lu.se
![]()
Abstract ![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Zini and M. Sigman Are Tests of Sperm DNA Damage Clinically Useful? Pros and Cons J Androl, May 1, 2009; 30(3): 219 - 229. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. P. M. Sousa, R. S. Tavares, J. F. Velez de la Calle, H. Figueiredo, V. Almeida, T. Almeida-Santos, and J. Ramalho-Santos Dual use of Diff-Quik-like stains for the simultaneous evaluation of human sperm morphology and chromatin status Hum. Reprod., January 1, 2009; 24(1): 28 - 36. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. E. M. Lewis and I. M. Agbaje Using the alkaline comet assay in prognostic tests for male infertility and assisted reproductive technology outcomes Mutagenesis, May 1, 2008; 23(3): 163 - 170. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. E M Lewis Is sperm evaluation useful in predicting human fertility? Reproduction, July 1, 2007; 134(1): 31 - 40. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Lefievre, K. Bedu-Addo, S. J Conner, G. S M Machado-Oliveira, Y. Chen, J. C Kirkman-Brown, M. A Afnan, S. J Publicover, W C. L Ford, and C. L R Barratt Counting sperm does not add up any more: time for a new equation? Reproduction, April 1, 2007; 133(4): 675 - 684. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Bungum, P. Humaidan, A. Axmon, M. Spano, L. Bungum, J. Erenpreiss, and A. Giwercman Sperm DNA integrity assessment in prediction of assisted reproduction technology outcome Hum. Reprod., January 1, 2007; 22(1): 174 - 179. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||



