Skip Navigation



Hum. Reprod. Advance Access published online on June 13, 2006
Human Reproduction, doi:10.1093/humrep/del226
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
21/10/2486    most recent
del226v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by James, W. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by James, W. H.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org
Received April 3, 2005
Revised May 11, 2006
Accepted May 11, 2006

Opinion

Are there preconceptional determinants of mammalian sex? A response to Boklage (2005)

William H. James 1 *

1 The Galton Laboratory, University College London, London, UK

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
William H. James, E-mail: whjames{at}waitrose.com


  Abstract

Boklage (2005, Hum Reprod 20,583-587) wrote: ‘Changes in, or mediated by, the epigenetic environment of embryogenesis provide the most plausible prospects for causes of changes in secondary sex ratio’. Without impugning this notion, I suggest here that other causes of variation in secondary sex ratio antedate fertilization or, in other words, that there are circumstances under which unequal numbers of male and female zygotes are formed. It will be documented here that this suggestion has repeatedly been made on the basis of data on many mammalian species (golden hamster, sheep, mouse, white-tailed deer, American bison, springbok, domestic cattle and Barbary macaque). It may be acknowledged that the causes of this hypothesized preconceptional variation are not established. I have suggested one (parental hormones around the time of conception). But the truth of that hypothesis is not germane to the thrust of the present argument--which is to document the strong suspicions that such preconceptional determinants do, indeed, exist. Efforts should be made to confirm or discredit these suspicions.

Keywords: preconceptional determinants/sex ratio.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J EndocrinolHome page
W. H James
Evidence that mammalian sex ratios at birth are partially controlled by parental hormone levels around the time of conception
J. Endocrinol., July 1, 2008; 198(1): 3 - 15.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Biol. Reprod.Home page
V.J. Grant, R.J. Irwin, N.T. Standley, A.N. Shelling, and L.W. Chamley
Sex of Bovine Embryos May Be Related to Mothers' Preovulatory Follicular Testosterone
Biol Reprod, May 1, 2008; 78(5): 812 - 815.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.