Skip Navigation



Hum. Reprod. Advance Access published online on September 18, 2006

Human Reproduction, doi:10.1093/humrep/del358
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
22/1/230    most recent
del358v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Scott, L.
Right arrow Articles by Hill, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Scott, L.
Right arrow Articles by Hill, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org
Received June 13, 2006
Revised July 31, 2006
Accepted August 14, 2006

Article

Morphologic parameters of early cleavage-stage embryos that correlate with fetal development and delivery: prospective and applied data for increased pregnancy rates

L. Scott 1 *, A. Finn 1, T. O’Leary 1, S. McLellan 1, and J. Hill 1

1 The Fertility Centers of New England, Reading, MA, USA

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
L. Scott, E-mail: scottl{at}fertilitycenter.com


   Abstract

BACKGROUND: Many different embryo selection criteria have been used in assisted reproductive technologies (ART), but there are no published prospective studies to ascertain their usefulness in predicting implantation. METHODS: In a prospective trial, 20 early scoring parameters previously reported to influence clinical outcome were collected, but embryos were selected for transfer by current laboratory protocols; day 1 pronuclear (PN) (Z) score combined with day 3 or 5 morphology. Data points for each oocyte/embryo were scored independently and tracked individually. Data were analysed retrospectively for parameters most likely to result in a positive pregnancy test, fetal heartbeat (FHB) and delivery. RESULTS: Results indicated that day 1 PN morphology and nucleolar precursor body (NPB) ratio, day 2 cell number, blastomere symmetry and nucleation and the ability to cleave from day 2 to day 3 were the six most significant factors in fetal development. This outcome was then applied prospectively over 8 months. The implantation rate (IR) and clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) increased in each age group, and the number of embryos used decreased. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, early parameters that include PN morphology, number and ratio of NPBs per nucleus and the day 2 morphology of cleaving embryos are stronger positive predictors of implantation than day 3 morphology or the ability to achieve the blastocyst stage of development. Parameters that were most consistently correlated with no delivery were lack of PN symmetry, day 2 multi-nucleation and uneven cell size. Day 3 and day 5 parameters were not significant compared with the combination of early parameters.

Keywords: day 1 and day 2 scoring/delivery/early embryo morphology/implantation potential.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
C.G. Vergouw, L.L. Botros, P. Roos, J.W. Lens, R. Schats, P.G.A. Hompes, D.H. Burns, and C.B Lambalk
Metabolomic profiling by near-infrared spectroscopy as a tool to assess embryo viability: a novel, non-invasive method for embryo selection
Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2008; 23(7): 1499 - 1504.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
P. Sundstrom and P. Saldeen
On nucleation and implantation: 0% mononucleation or 100% mononucleation in blastomeres is not the whole story
Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2008; 23(2): 459 - 459.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
L. Scott
Reply: On nucleation and implantation: 0% mononucleation or 100% mononucleation in blastomeres is not the whole story
Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2008; 23(2): 459 - 460.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
N. R Mtango and K. E Latham
Differential Expression of Cell Cycle Genes in Rhesus Monkey Oocytes and Embryos of Different Developmental Potentials
Biol Reprod, February 1, 2008; 78(2): 254 - 266.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.