Skip Navigation



Hum. Reprod. Advance Access published online on September 12, 2006

Human Reproduction, doi:10.1093/humrep/del362
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
22/1/210    most recent
del362v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ragni, G.
Right arrow Articles by Somigliana, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ragni, G.
Right arrow Articles by Somigliana, E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org
Received May 13, 2006
Revised July 16, 2006
Accepted August 3, 2006

Article

Follicular vascularity is not predictive of pregnancy outcome in mild controlled ovarian stimulation and IUI cycles

G. Ragni 1, M. Anselmino 1, A.E. Nicolosi 2, M.E. Brambilla 2, G. Calanna 2, and E. Somigliana 1 *

1 Infertility Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Mangiagalli e Regina Elena, Milan, Italy
2 Infertility Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Mangiagalli e Regina Elena, Milan, Italy; Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
E. Somigliana, E-mail: dadosomigliana{at}yahoo.it


   Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although follicular vascularity has been shown to be a good indicator of oocyte quality in IVF, scant evidence is currently available on the predictive value of this variable in terms of pregnancy rate during controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) and intrauterine insemination (IUI) cycles. METHODS: Three-hundred and eighteen patients who had received mild COS underwent transvaginal ultrasound scan before performing the IUI. Using power Doppler imaging, vascularity of follicles with a mean diameter ≥16 mm was graded into a three grades according to the circumference of the follicle in which flow was identified. When more than one follicle was observed, grading was performed for all of them, and the highest vascularity grade was recorded. RESULTS: Clinical pregnancy rate (number/total) in the low-, medium- and high-grade vascularity groups was 14.1% (14/99), 10.0% (10/100) and 11.8% (14/119), respectively (P = 0.66). Similar results were observed when only monofollicular cycles were considered. CONCLUSIONS: Follicular vascularity does not predict the chance of pregnancy in women undergoing mild COS and IUI cycles.

Keywords: clinical pregnancy/follicular vascularity/IUI/ovarian stimulation/power Doppler.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ReproductionHome page
M A R Siddiqui, E L Gastal, M O Gastal, M Almamun, M A Beg, and O J Ginther
Relationship of vascular perfusion of the wall of the preovulatory follicle to in vitro fertilisation and embryo development in heifers
Reproduction, April 1, 2009; 137(4): 689 - 697.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.