Skip Navigation



Hum. Reprod. Advance Access published online on October 27, 2006

Human Reproduction, doi:10.1093/humrep/del380
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
22/2/346    most recent
del380v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Riveles, K.
Right arrow Articles by Talbot, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Riveles, K.
Right arrow Articles by Talbot, P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org
Received July 5, 2006
Revised August 21, 2006
Accepted August 31, 2006

Article

Smoke from traditional commercial, harm reduction and research brand cigarettes impairs oviductal functioning in hamsters (Mesocricetus auratus) in vitro

K. Riveles 1, V. Tran 2, R. Roza 2, D. Kwan 2, and P. Talbot 3 *

1 Graduate Program in Environmental Toxicology, University of California Riverside, Riverside, CA, USA
2 Department of Cell Biology and Neuroscience, University of California Riverside, Riverside, CA, USA
3 Graduate Program in Environmental Toxicology, University of California Riverside, Riverside, CA, USA; Department of Cell Biology and Neuroscience, University of California Riverside, Riverside, CA, USA

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
P. Talbot, E-mail: talbot{at}ucr.edu


   Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cigarette smoke from 2R1 research brand cigarettes and specific toxicants in smoke inhibit oviductal functioning. Our purpose was to test the hypothesis that smoke from commercial cigarettes, including harm reduction cigarettes, inhibits oviductal functioning and to measure the concentration of previously identified toxicants in smoke from research and commercial cigarettes. METHODS: Mainstream (MS) and sidestream (SS) smoke solutions from two research, six traditional commercial and three harm reduction brands were tested in vitro using an oviductal assay that measures ciliary beat frequency, oocyte retrieval rate and smooth muscle contraction. RESULTS: Generally, smoke from each brand of cigarette was inhibitory in the three oviductal bioassays. SS, the major component of environmental tobacco smoke, was usually more inhibitory than MS, the smoke inhaled by active smokers. Nine cigarette toxicants, previously shown to be highly inhibitory in the oviductal bioassays, were quantified in MS and SS. 4-Methylpyridine, which was inhibitory by itself in picomolar doses, was present in the highest concentration in MS and SS solutions from all brands tested. In general, toxicant concentrations were higher in SS than in MS solutions. CONCLUSIONS: These data show that commercial brands of cigarettes, including harm reduction cigarettes, contain toxicants that inhibit biological processes in the oviduct and could affect reproductive outcomes.

Keywords: oviduct/cigarette smoke/cilia/oocyte/smooth muscle contraction.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
S. Lin, V. Tran, and P. Talbot
Comparison of toxicity of smoke from traditional and harm-reduction cigarettes using mouse embryonic stem cells as a novel model for preimplantation development
Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2009; 24(2): 386 - 397.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.