Hum. Reprod. Advance Access published online on October 25, 2006
Human Reproduction, doi:10.1093/humrep/del414
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. BACKGROUND: In mice, administration of the glycosphingolipid biosynthesis inhibitor miglustat results in reversible infertilty, characterized by impaired sperm motility and markedly abnormal sperm morphology. This observation suggested that miglustat might have utility for fertility control in man. To ascertain the impact of miglustat on human spermatogenesis, we conducted a pilot study of miglustat administration in normal men. METHODS: After a 2-week baseline period, seven normal men were administered miglustat 100 mg, orally, twice daily for 6 weeks. During treatment, subjects had frequent seminal fluid analyses to assess the impact of treatment on sperm concentration, motility and morphology and the ability to undergo the acrosome reaction by in vitro assays. RESULTS: Five subjects completed all aspects of the study. In these subjects, there was no apparent effect of miglustat on sperm concentration, motility or sperm morphology after 6 weeks of therapy. In addition, no changes in acrosome structure or function were observed with treatment, despite therapeutic concentrations of miglustat in the serum and seminal plasma. All subjects experienced gastrointestinal upset, diarrhoea and mild weight loss during treatment. No other abnormalities in blood counts, serum chemistries, vision or overall health were observed. CONCLUSION: In contrast to the observations in mice, the oral administration of miglustat does not appear to affect human spermatogenesis. Further elucidation of the mechanism underlying the species specificity of miglustat may improve our understanding of the role of glycosphingolipids in spermatogenesis and result in alternative approaches to male fertility control.
Received August 28, 2006
Revised September 19, 2006
Accepted September 26, 2006
Article
Miglustat has no apparent effect on spermatogenesis in normal men
J.K. Amory 1 *, C.H. Muller 2, S.T. Page 1, E. Leifke 3, E.R. Pagel 2, A. Bhandari 4, B. Subramanyam 5, W. Bone 3, A. Radlmaier 3, and W.J. Bremner 1
2 Department of Urology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
3 Schering AG, Berlin, Germany
4 Department of Ophthalmology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
5 Drug Metabolism, Berlex Biosciences, Richmond, CA, USA
J.K. Amory, E-mail: jamory{at}u.washington.edu
![]()
Abstract ![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
P Sipila, J Jalkanen, I T Huhtaniemi, and M Poutanen Novel epididymal proteins as targets for the development of post-testicular male contraception Reproduction, March 1, 2009; 137(3): 379 - 389. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. T. Page, J. K. Amory, and W. J. Bremner Advances in Male Contraception Endocr. Rev., June 1, 2008; 29(4): 465 - 493. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||

