Hum. Reprod. Advance Access published online on October 27, 2006
Human Reproduction, doi:10.1093/humrep/del421
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 Mother-Infant Department, Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. BACKGROUND: Recently, a new marker, the anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH), has been evaluated as a marker of ovarian response. Serum AMH levels have been measured at frequent time-points during the menstrual cycle, suggesting the complete absence of fluctuation. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether serum AMH measurement on any day of the menstrual cycle could predict ovarian response in women undergoing assisted reproductive technology (ART). METHODS: This study included 48 women attending the IVF/ICSI programme. Blood withdrawal for AMH measurement was performed in all the patients independently of the day of the menstrual cycle. RESULTS: Women in the lowest AMH quartile (<0.4 ng/ml) were older and required a higher dose of recombinant FSH than women in the highest quartile (>7 ng/ml). All the cancelled cycles due to absent response were in the group of the lowest AMH quartile, whereas the cancelled cycles due to risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) were in the group of the highest AMH quartile. This study demonstrated a strong correlation between serum AMH levels and ovarian response to gonadotrophin stimulation. CONCLUSION: For the first time, clinicians may have a reliable serum marker of ovarian response that can be measured independently of the day of the menstrual cycle.
Received August 1, 2006
Revised September 25, 2006
Accepted September 29, 2006
Article
Anti-Müllerian hormone measurement on any day of the menstrual cycle strongly predicts ovarian response in assisted reproductive technology
A. La Marca 1 *, S. Giulini 1, A. Tirelli 1, E. Bertucci 1, T. Marsella 1, S. Xella 1, and A. Volpe 1
A. La Marca, E-mail: antlamarca{at}libero.it
![]()
Abstract ![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. van Disseldorp, C.B. Lambalk, J. Kwee, C.W.N. Looman, M.J.C. Eijkemans, B.C. Fauser, and F.J. Broekmans Comparison of inter- and intra-cycle variability of anti-Mullerian hormone and antral follicle counts Hum. Reprod., October 19, 2009; (2009) dep366v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. La Marca, G. Sighinolfi, D. Radi, C. Argento, E. Baraldi, A. C. Artenisio, G. Stabile, and A. Volpe Anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) as a predictive marker in assisted reproductive technology (ART) Hum. Reprod. Update, September 30, 2009; (2009) dmp036v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. La Marca, F.J. Broekmans, A. Volpe, B.C. Fauser, N.S. Macklon, and on behalf of the ESHRE Special Interest Group for Anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH): what do we still need to know? Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2009; 24(9): 2264 - 2275. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. J. Broekmans, M. R. Soules, and B. C. Fauser Ovarian Aging: Mechanisms and Clinical Consequences Endocr. Rev., August 1, 2009; 30(5): 465 - 493. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Jayaprakasan, B.K. Campbell, J.F. Hopkisson, J.S. Clewes, I.R. Johnson, and N.J. Raine-Fenning Effect of pituitary desensitization on the early growing follicular cohort estimated using anti-Mullerian hormone Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2008; 23(11): 2577 - 2583. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. van Disseldorp, M. J. Faddy, A. P. N. Themmen, F. H. de Jong, P. H. M. Peeters, Y. T. van der Schouw, and F. J. M. Broekmans Relationship of Serum Antimullerian Hormone Concentration to Age at Menopause J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., June 1, 2008; 93(6): 2129 - 2134. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Gnoth, A.N. Schuring, K. Friol, J. Tigges, P. Mallmann, and E. Godehardt Relevance of anti-Mullerian hormone measurement in a routine IVF program Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2008; 23(6): 1359 - 1365. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T.E.M. Verhagen, D.J. Hendriks, L.F.J.M.M. Bancsi, B.W.J. Mol, and F.J.M. Broekmans The accuracy of multivariate models predicting ovarian reserve and pregnancy after in vitro fertilization: a meta-analysis Hum. Reprod. Update, March 1, 2008; 14(2): 95 - 100. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B.C.J.M. Fauser, K. Diedrich, P. Devroey, and on behalf of the Evian Annual Reproduction (EVAR) Predictors of ovarian response: progress towards individualized treatment in ovulation induction and ovarian stimulation Hum. Reprod. Update, January 1, 2008; 14(1): 1 - 14. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T.-H. Lee, C.-H. Liu, C.-C. Huang, Y.-L. Wu, Y.-T. Shih, H.-N. Ho, Y.-S. Yang, and M.-S. Lee Serum anti-mullerian hormone and estradiol levels as predictors of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome in assisted reproduction technology cycles Hum. Reprod., January 1, 2008; 23(1): 160 - 167. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||



