Hum. Reprod. Advance Access published online on November 17, 2006
Human Reproduction, doi:10.1093/humrep/del435
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 Assisted Conception Unit, Sheffield, UK; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. BACKGROUND: Unexpectedly poor response leading to IVF cycle cancellation is a distressing treatment outcome. We have prospectively assessed several markers of ovarian reserve in a high risk IVF population to determine their utility in predicting IVF cycle cancellation. METHODS: Eighty-four women at high risk of cycle cancellation due to raised FSH, previous poor response and/or age
Received April 13, 2006
Revised September 7, 2006
Accepted September 11, 2006
Article
Evaluation of the utility of multiple endocrine and ultrasound measures of ovarian reserve in the prediction of cycle cancellation in a high-risk IVF population
M. McIlveen 1 *, J.D. Skull 2, and W.L. Ledger 3
2 Assisted Conception Unit, Sheffield, UK
3 Assisted Conception Unit, Sheffield, UK; Academic Unit for Reproductive and Developmental Medicine, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
M. McIlveen, E-mail: myvanwy{at}mcilveen.com.au
Abstract 
40 years attending for high-dose short protocol IVF treatment had baseline measures of FSH, inhibin B, anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH), antral follicle count (AFC) and ovarian volume. A GnRH agonist was then administered and, 24 h later, estradiol (E2) and inhibin B measures were repeated. RESULTS: Fifty-seven per cent of patients in this study had a poor response to stimulation, and 15% were cancelled. Using multivariate logistic regression, we found that day 3 inhibin B levels were the best predictor of cycle cancellation with an area under the receiver operating curve (ROC AUC) = 0.78 (P = 0.017). When only considering baseline variables, mean ovarian volume was the best predictor of cycle cancellation (ROC AUC = 0.78; P = 0.016). AMH concentrations were the best predictor of a poor response (P = 0.003), and AMH was also predictive of cycle cancellation (P = 0.007) with very little inter-cycle variability. None of the parameters studied were predictive of ongoing pregnancy. CONCLUSIONS: This group of at-risk patients had a high rate of poor response to simulation and cancellation. Although several measures of ovarian reserve were able to predict cycle cancellation, none were able to predict pregnancy. AMH was predictive of both cycle cancellation and poor response with little inter-cycle variability.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  J. van Disseldorp, M. J. Faddy, A. P. N. Themmen, F. H. de Jong, P. H. M. Peeters, Y. T. van der Schouw, and F. J. M. Broekmans Relationship of Serum Antimullerian Hormone Concentration to Age at Menopause J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., June 1, 2008; 93(6): 2129 - 2134. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 T.E.M. Verhagen, D.J. Hendriks, L.F.J.M.M. Bancsi, B.W.J. Mol, and F.J.M. Broekmans The accuracy of multivariate models predicting ovarian reserve and pregnancy after in vitro fertilization: a meta-analysis Hum. Reprod. Update, March 1, 2008; 14(2): 95 - 100. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. J. Moran, M. Noakes, P. M. Clifton, and R. J. Norman The Use of Anti-Mullerian Hormone in Predicting Menstrual Response after Weight Loss in Overweight Women with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., October 1, 2007; 92(10): 3796 - 3802. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|