Skip Navigation



Hum. Reprod. Advance Access published online on June 21, 2007

Human Reproduction, doi:10.1093/humrep/dem158
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
22/8/2075    most recent
dem158v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pennings, G.
Right arrow Articles by Ombelet, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pennings, G.
Right arrow Articles by Ombelet, W.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

NEW DEBATE

Coming soon to your clinic: patient-friendly ART

Guido Pennings1,3 and Willem Ombelet2

1 Bioethics Institute Ghent, Ghent University, Blandijnberg 2, 9000 Gent, Belgium 2 Genk Institute for Fertility Treatment, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Genk, Belgium

3 Correspondence address. Tel./Fax: 0032 16 620 767; E-mail: guido.pennings{at}ugent.be

The current practice in medically assisted reproduction is still too exclusively focused on effectiveness and success rates. This has a number of considerable, and more importantly, avoidable drawbacks. Single embryo transfer was an important move away from this model to include safety and welfare of mother and child. Patient-friendly ART goes one big step further. It is composed of a mix of four criteria: cost-effectiveness, equity of access, minimal risk for mother and child and minimal burden for patients. All four components have a strong normative ethical basis: cost-effectiveness relies on the optimal use of community resources to maximise well-being; equity of access is based on justice, minimal risk is founded on the fundamental non-maleficence rule and minimal burden is largely based on the autonomy principle. The inclusion of the four criteria in decision-making about treatment would express these values in clinical practice.

Key words: patient-friendly IVF/cost-effectiveness/ethics/risk/psychology


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
P. Devroey, R. Boostanfar, N.P. Koper, B.M.J.L. Mannaerts, P.C. IJzerman-Boon, B.C.J.M. Fauser, and on behalf of the ENGAGE Investigators
A double-blind, non-inferiority RCT comparing corifollitropin alfa and recombinant FSH during the first seven days of ovarian stimulation using a GnRH antagonist protocol
Hum. Reprod., August 14, 2009; (2009) dep291v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
P. Devroey, M. Aboulghar, J. Garcia-Velasco, G. Griesinger, P. Humaidan, E. Kolibianakis, W. Ledger, C. Tomas, and B. C.J.M. Fauser
Improving the patient's experience of IVF/ICSI: a proposal for an ovarian stimulation protocol with GnRH antagonist co-treatment
Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2009; 24(4): 764 - 774.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
M.F.G. Verberg, N.S. Macklon, G. Nargund, R. Frydman, P. Devroey, F.J. Broekmans, and B.C.J.M. Fauser
Mild ovarian stimulation for IVF
Hum. Reprod. Update, January 1, 2009; 15(1): 13 - 29.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
G. Pennings and for the ESHRE Task Force on Ethics and Law
Reply: Adapting infertility treatment to religious beliefs
Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2008; 23(12): 2867 - 2868.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ESHRE MonogrHome page
W. Ombelet
False perceptions and common misunderstandings surrounding the subject of infertility in developing countries
ESHRE Monogr, July 1, 2008; 2008(1): 8 - 11.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ESHRE MonogrHome page
G. Pennings
Ethical issues of infertility treatment in developing countries
ESHRE Monogr, July 1, 2008; 2008(1): 15 - 20.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
I. W.H. van Empel, W. L.D.M. Nelen, R. P.M.G. Hermens, and J. A.M. Kremer
Coming soon to your clinic: high-quality ART
Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2008; 23(6): 1242 - 1245.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
G. Nargund, B.C.J.M. Fauser, N.S. Macklon, W. Ombelet, K. Nygren, R. Frydman, and for the Rotterdam ISMAAR Consensus Group on Termin
The ISMAAR proposal on terminology for ovarian stimulation for IVF
Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2007; 22(11): 2801 - 2804.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.