Skip Navigation



Hum. Reprod. Advance Access published online on July 30, 2007

Human Reproduction, doi:10.1093/humrep/dem215
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
22/10/2665    most recent
dem215v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mourad, S.M.
Right arrow Articles by Kremer, J.A.M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mourad, S.M.
Right arrow Articles by Kremer, J.A.M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Guideline-based development of quality indicators for subfertility care

S.M. Mourad1,2, R.P.M.G. Hermens2, W.L.D.M. Nelen1, D.D.M. Braat1, R.P.T.M. Grol2 and J.A.M. Kremer1,*

1 Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands 2 Centre for Quality of Care Research (WOK), Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands

3 Correspondence address. Tel: +31-243617351; Fax: +31-243668597; E-mail: j.kremer{at}obgyn.umcn.nl

BACKGROUND: Internationally, several organizations have developed clinical guidelines for subfertility care to supply patients with the best possible care. However, to improve the implementation of such guidelines, we first need to gain insight into the application of clinical guidelines in daily practice. Valid quality indicators are necessary to estimate actual guideline adherence. However, none of the existing subfertility guideline programmes is accompanied by a satisfactory set of quality indicators. In this study, we develop a set of valid guideline-based quality indicators for subfertility care.

METHODS: A systematic RAND-modified Delphi method was used to develop a set of key recommendations based on 10 national Dutch subfertility guidelines, international literature and existing international indicators. Experts’ opinions were used to appraise recommendations regarding specific criteria such as efficacy, level of health gain, applicability and potential for care improvement.

RESULTS: A representative set of 39 key recommendations was selected from 303 initial recommendations. The recommendations covered two structural and 37 procedural aspects, the latter encompassing ‘indications for treatment’, ‘diagnostic procedures’, ‘treatment procedures’ and ‘patient information’.

CONCLUSIONS: This study describes the systematic, stepwise method used to develop 39 process and structure indicators that can be used to monitor subfertility care.

Key words: guidelines/indicator/monitoring/quality of care/subfertility

Submitted on March 26, 2007; resubmitted on June 11, 2007; accepted on June 18, 2007.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
S.M. Mourad, W.L.D.M. Nelen, R.P.M.G. Hermens, L.F. Bancsi, D.D.M. Braat, G.A. Zielhuis, R.P.T.M. Grol, and J.A.M. Kremer
Variation in subfertility care measured by guideline-based performance indicators
Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2008; 23(11): 2493 - 2500.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ESHRE MonogrHome page
C. Huyser
Affordable ART services in Africa: synthesis and adaptation of laboratory services
ESHRE Monogr, July 1, 2008; 2008(1): 77 - 84.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.