Skip Navigation



Hum. Reprod. Advance Access published online on September 5, 2007
Human Reproduction, doi:10.1093/humrep/dem264
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
22/11/2829    most recent
dem264v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pasquier, E.
Right arrow Articles by Mottier, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pasquier, E.
Right arrow Articles by Mottier, D.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Strong evidence that skewed X-chromosome inactivation is not associated with recurrent pregnancy loss: an incident paired case–control study

E. Pasquier1,4, C. Bohec2, L. De Saint Martin1, C. Le Maréchal3, M. T. Le Martelot2, S. Roche2, Y. Laurent2, C. Férec3, M. Collet2 and D. Mottier1

1 EA 3878 (GETBO), Department of Internal Medicine and Chest Diseases, Brest University Hospital, La Cavale Blanche Hospital, 29609 Brest, France 2 Division of Gynaecology, Brest University Hospital, Morvan Hospital, 29220 Brest, France 3 INSERM U613, EFS, 29220 Brest, France

4 Correspondence address. Tel: +33-298-347-336; Fax: +33-298-347-944; E-mail: elisabeth.pasquier{at}chu-brest.fr

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have reported conflicting results regarding recurrent pregnancy loss and skewed X-chromosome inactivation. Hence, we sought an association by carrying out a specifically designed incident paired case–control study with required statistical power.

METHODS: Design incident 1:3 matched case–control study, from 2003 to 2007. Setting: University Hospital of Brest. Patients: Women, from the Brittany area, consecutively referred for at least two unexplained consecutive spontaneous abortions. Controls: Women from the same geographic area, with no history of pregnancy loss and at least one normal pregnancy, recruited using electoral lists and then paired with cases, with respect to age, to within 1 year. Intervention: Assessment of skewed X-chromosome inactivation. Statistical analysis: Comparison of the ratio of >90% skewed X-chromosome inactivation by conditional logistic regression.

RESULTS: Five hundred and forty-three controls (mean age: 34.3 years) were paired within 1 year to 200 cases. The cases (mean age: 33.6 years) had experienced between 2 and 14 consecutive losses (median 3). The rate of >90% skewed X-chromosome inactivation was not statistically different (P = 0.33, odds ratio: 0.58, 95% confidence interval: 0.19–1.77) between cases and paired controls, 2.27% versus 4.1%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that there is no association between skewed X-chromosome inactivation and recurrent pregnancy loss, defined as two or more unexplained consecutive spontaneous abortions.

Key words: paired case–control study/recurrent spontaneous abortion/skewed X-chromosome inactivation

E.P. designed the study, performed the clinical part of the research and wrote the paper. C.B. performed the clinical part of the research and wrote the paper. L.De S.M. analysed data. M.T.Le M., S.R., Y.L., M.C. and D.M. performed the clinical part of the research. C.Le M. and C.F. carried out the biological part of the research.

Submitted on May 3, 2007; resubmitted on July 13, 2007; accepted on July 24, 2007.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.