Skip Navigation



Hum. Reprod. Advance Access published online on September 28, 2007

Human Reproduction, doi:10.1093/humrep/dem311
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
22/12/3108    most recent
dem311v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chambers, G. M.
Right arrow Articles by Sullivan, E. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chambers, G. M.
Right arrow Articles by Sullivan, E. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Babies born after ART treatment cost more than non-ART babies: a cost analysis of inpatient birth-admission costs of singleton and multiple gestation pregnancies

Georgina M. Chambers1,5, Michael G. Chapman2,3, Narelle Grayson1, Marian Shanahan4 and Elizabeth A. Sullivan1,2

1 National Perinatal Statistics Unit, School of Women’s and Children’s Health, University of New South Wales, McNevin Dickson Building, Randwick Hospitals Campus, Randwick, NSW 2031, Australia 2 Discipline of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, School of Women’s and Children’s Health, University of New South Wales, Royal Hospital for Women, Locked Bag 2000, Randwick, NSW 2031, Australia 3 IVFAustralia, St George Private Hospital, Kogarah, NSW 2217, Australia 4 National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, University of New South Wales, Randwick Campus, King Street, Randwick, NSW 2031, Australia

5 Correspondence address. Tel: +61-2-9382 1014; Fax: +61-2-9382 1025; E-mail: g.chambers{at}unsw.edu.au

BACKGROUND: Currently, about one-third of infants born after assisted reproductive technology (ART) worldwide are twins or triplets. This study compared the inpatient birth-admission costs of singleton and multiple gestation ART deliveries to non-ART deliveries.

METHODS: A cohort of 5005 mothers and 5886 infants conceived following ART treatment were compared to 245 249 mothers and 248 539 infants in the general population. Birth-admission costs were calculated using Australian Refined Diagnosis Related Groups and weighted national average costs (2003–2004 euro).

RESULTS: ART infants were 4.4 times more likely to be low birthweight (LBW) compared with non-ART infants, translating into 89% higher birth-admission costs ({euro}2832 and {euro}1502, respectively). ART singletons were also more likely to be LBW compared with non-ART singletons, translating into 31% higher birth-admission costs ({euro}1849 and {euro}1415, respectively). After combining infant and maternal admission costs, the average cost of an ART singleton delivery was {euro}4818 compared with {euro}13 890 for ART twins and {euro}54 294 for ART higher order multiples. Findings were not sensitive to changes in casemix.

CONCLUSIONS: The poorer neonatal outcomes of ART singletons compared with non-ART singletons are significant enough to impact healthcare resource consumption. The high costs associated with ART multiple births add to the overwhelming clinical and economic evidence in support of single embryo transfer.

Key words: assisted reproduction technology/cost analysis/multiple pregnancy/single embryo transfer

Submitted on July 18, 2007; resubmitted on August 28, 2007; accepted on September 4, 2007.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
M. Hansen, L. Colvin, B. Petterson, J. J. Kurinczuk, N. de Klerk, and C. Bower
Admission to hospital of singleton children born following assisted reproductive technology (ART)
Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2008; 23(6): 1297 - 1305.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.