Skip Navigation



Hum. Reprod. Advance Access published online on March 31, 2008

Human Reproduction, doi:10.1093/humrep/den045
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
23/6/1366    most recent
den045v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Skiadas, C. C.
Right arrow Articles by Racowsky, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Skiadas, C. C.
Right arrow Articles by Racowsky, C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Risk factors associated with pregnancies containing a monochorionic pair following assisted reproductive technologies

Christine C. Skiadas1, Stacey A. Missmer1,2,3, Carol B. Benson4, Rebekah E. Gee1 and Catherine Racowsky1,5

1 Department of Obstetrics Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis Street, ASB 1+3, Rm 082, Boston, 02115 MA, USA 2 Channing Laboratory, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, 02115 MA, USA 3 Department of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, 02115 MA, USA 4 Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, 02115 MA, USA

5 Correspondence address. Tel: +1-617-732-5455; Fax: +1-617-975-0825; E-mail: cracowsky{at}partners.org

BACKGROUND: Although several factors have been identified to predispose to an increased incidence of monozygotic twinning in assisted reproductive technologies (ART), the relative risks associated with each have yet to be fully established. Moreover, the focus has been predominantly on monozygosity, which, in the absence of monochorionicity, does not increase perinatal risk. The present objective was to undertake an analysis of the relative risks of factors associated with monochorionic pairs resulting from ART.

METHODS: Study cycles included the last cycle, of each patient undergoing ART at Brigham and Women's Hospital from January 1998 to December 2004, that resulted either in a pregnancy with a monochorionic pair (n = 41) or a pregnancy without a monochorionic pair at 12 weeks (n = 2460). We used multivariable logistic regression to estimate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) to identify factors significantly associated with a monochorionic pair.

RESULTS: Independent predictors of a monochorionic pair were assisted hatching (OR 2.23, 95% CI 1.06–4.67), ICSI (OR 2.42, 95% CI 1.22–4.83) and Day 5 embryo transfer (OR 2.48, 95% CI 1.62–3.80). The effects of ICSI and Day 5 transfer were amplified when cycles involved both interventions.

CONCLUSIONS: ICSI and Day 5 embryo transfer synergistically increase the risk of monochorionic placentation. Patients undergoing these procedures should be counselled regarding these increased risks.

Key words: monochorionic placentation/monozygotic pregnancies/assisted hatching/ICSI/IVF

Submitted on August 30, 2007; resubmitted on January 16, 2008; accepted on January 30, 2008.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ReproductionHome page
K I Aston, C M Peterson, and D T Carrell
Monozygotic twinning associated with assisted reproductive technologies: a review
Reproduction, October 1, 2008; 136(4): 377 - 386.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.