Skip Navigation



Hum. Reprod. Advance Access published online on May 1, 2008

Human Reproduction, doi:10.1093/humrep/den132
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
23/7/1627    most recent
den132v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Eijkemans, M.J.C.
Right arrow Articles by Habbema, J.D.F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Eijkemans, M.J.C.
Right arrow Articles by Habbema, J.D.F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Pregnancy chances on an IVF/ICSI waiting list: a national prospective cohort study

M.J.C. Eijkemans1,5, A.M.E. Lintsen2, C.C. Hunault1,3, C.A.M. Bouwmans4, L. Hakkaart4, D.D.M. Braat2 and J.D.F. Habbema1

1 Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Dr Molewaterplein 40, PO Box 1738, 3000 DR Rotterdam, The Netherlands 2 Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands 3 National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, The Netherlands 4 Institute for Medical Technology Assessment Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

5 Correspondence address. Fax: +31-10-408-9449; E-mail: m.eijkemans{at}erasmusmc.nl

BACKGROUND: The effectiveness of IVF over expectant management has been proven only for bilateral tubal occlusion. We aimed to estimate the chance of pregnancy without treatment for IVF patients, using data on the waiting period before the start of IVF.

METHODS: A prospective cohort study included all couples eligible for IVF or ICSI treatment, registered in a national waiting list in The Netherlands. The cumulative probability of treatment-free ongoing pregnancy on the IVF waiting list was assessed and the predictive effect of female age, duration of infertility, primary or secondary infertility and diagnostic category was estimated using Cox regression.

RESULTS: We included 5962 couples on the waiting list. The cumulative probability of treatment-free ongoing pregnancy was 9% at 12 months. In multivariable Cox regression, hazard ratios were: 0.95 (P < 0.001) per year of the woman’s age, 0.85 (P < 0.001) per year of duration of infertility, 0.71 (P = 0.005) for primary versus secondary infertility. Diagnostic category showed hazard ratios of 0.7, 1.6, 1.2, 1.7 and 2.6 for endometriosis, male factor, hormonal, immunological and unexplained infertility, respectively, compared with ‘tubal infertility’ (P < 0.001). The 12-months predicted probabilities ranged from 0% to 25%.

CONCLUSIONS: The chance of an ongoing pregnancy without treatment while waiting for an IVF or ICSI is below 10% but may be as high as 25% within 1 year for selected patient groups. Timing of IVF should take predictive factors into consideration.

Key words: IVF/ICSI/spontaneous pregnancy/infertility

Submitted on November 30, 2007; resubmitted on March 16, 2008; accepted on March 28, 2008.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
M. Brandes, J.O.M. van der Steen, S.B. Bokdam, C.J.C.M. Hamilton, J.P. de Bruin, W.L.D.M. Nelen, and J.A.M. Kremer
When and why do subfertile couples discontinue their fertility care? A longitudinal cohort study in a secondary care subfertility population
Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2009; 24(12): 3127 - 3135.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
M. Brandes, C.J.C.M. Hamilton, J.P. de Bruin, W.L.D.M. Nelen, and J.A.M. Kremer
The relative contribution of IVF to the total ongoing pregnancy rate in a subfertile cohort
Hum. Reprod., October 24, 2009; (2009) dep341v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
A.M.E. Lintsen, D.D.M. Braat, J.D.F. Habbema, J.A.M. Kremer, and M.J.C. Eijkemans
Can differences in IVF success rates between centres be explained by patient characteristics and sample size?
Hum. Reprod., October 16, 2009; (2009) dep358v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
A. Pinborg, C.O. Hougaard, A. Nyboe Andersen, D. Molbo, and L. Schmidt
Prospective longitudinal cohort study on cumulative 5-year delivery and adoption rates among 1338 couples initiating infertility treatment
Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2009; 24(4): 991 - 999.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JWatch Women's HealthHome page
Spontaneous Pregnancy While Awaiting Assisted Reproductive Technology
Journal Watch Women's Health, September 11, 2008; 2008(911): 4 - 4.
[Full Text]


Home page
BMJHome page
T. A El-Toukhy and Y. Khalaf
Treatment of unexplained infertility
BMJ, August 7, 2008; 337(aug07_2): a772 - a772.
[Full Text]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.