Skip Navigation



Hum. Reprod. Advance Access published online on June 12, 2008

Human Reproduction, doi:10.1093/humrep/den226
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
23/9/2031    most recent
den226v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Niemann, I.
Right arrow Articles by Sunde, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Niemann, I.
Right arrow Articles by Sunde, L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Twin pregnancies with diploid hydatidiform mole and co-existing normal fetus may originate from one oocyte

Isa Niemann1,3, Lars Bolund2 and Lone Sunde1

1 Department of Clinical Genetics, University Hospital of Aarhus, 8000 Aarhus C, Denmark 2 Institute of Human Genetics, University of Aarhus, 8000 Aarhus C, Denmark

3 Correspondence address. Bragesvej 38, 8230 Aabyhoej, Denmark. Tel: +45-41695588; E-mail: in{at}dadlnet.dk

BACKGROUND: In twin pregnancies comprising a hydatidiform mole and a normal co-fetus, the ploidy of the mole is almost exclusively reported as diploid and very rarely as triploid. We aimed at understanding this unbalanced distribution of diploid and triploid moles in twin pregnancies by investigating the number of gametes involved.

METHODS: Using polymorphic DNA markers, we compared the alleles of seven moles with those of the normal co-fetuses and deduced the number of oocytes and spermatozoa represented in each twin pregnancy.

RESULTS: The genomes of all seven moles were androgenetic diploid; six moles were homozygous in all loci analyzed and one mole was heterozygous in several loci. In one homozygous mole, the paternal alleles were identical to those of the normal co-fetus in 13 non-linked informative microsatellite loci, indicating the involvement of one spermatozoon only, and thus of one oocyte only. Duplications of the paternal genome followed by abnormal cell division can explain this observation. In six moles, the paternal alleles were different from those of the normal co-fetus suggesting involvement of two (or more) spermatozoa. Overfertilization of one oocyte followed by abnormal cell division is a possibility.

CONCLUSIONS: It is possible that twin pregnancies comprising a diploid mole and a normal co-fetus most often derive from one single oocyte fertilized with one or more spermatozoa. This can explain why diploid moles are far more frequent than triploid moles in twin pregnancies.

Key words: hydatidiform mole/twin pregnancy/parental origin/ploidy

Submitted on March 13, 2008; resubmitted on April 24, 2008; accepted on April 30, 2008.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum Mol GenetHome page
C. Deveault, J. H. Qian, W. Chebaro, A. Ao, L. Gilbert, A. Mehio, R. Khan, S. L. Tan, A. Wischmeijer, P. Coullin, et al.
NLRP7 mutations in women with diploid androgenetic and triploid moles: a proposed mechanism for mole formation
Hum. Mol. Genet., March 1, 2009; 18(5): 888 - 897.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
B. Rosenbusch
Co-existence of a diploid hydatidiform mole and a normal fetus: mysterious events at the pronuclear stage
Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2008; 23(12): 2876 - 2877.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.