Skip Navigation



Hum. Reprod. Advance Access published online on January 23, 2009

Human Reproduction, doi:10.1093/humrep/den409
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF )
Right arrow Supplementary Data
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
24/5/1152    most recent
den409v2
den409v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gakamsky, A.
Right arrow Articles by Eisenbach, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gakamsky, A.
Right arrow Articles by Eisenbach, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Behavioral response of human spermatozoa to a concentration jump of chemoattractants or intracellular cyclic nucleotides

Anna Gakamsky, Leah Armon and Michael Eisenbach1

Department of Biological Chemistry, The Weizmann Institute of Science, 76100 Rehovot, Israel

1 Correspondence address. Tel: +972-8-934-3923; Fax: +972-8-947-2722; E-mail: m.eisenbach{at}weizmann.ac.il

BACKGROUND: A major question in mammalian sperm chemotaxis is whether the cells sense a chemoattractant gradient by comparing the chemoattractant concentration between time points or between spatial points.

METHODS: To resolve this question, we exposed human spermatozoa to a temporal chemoattractant gradient under conditions of no spatial gradient by rapidly mixing the cells with progesterone or bourgeonal on a microscope slide and analyzing their swimming with motion analysis software.

RESULTS: The cells responded within seconds with an increase in velocity and lateral head displacement, and with a decrease in the linearity of swimming, becoming hyperactivated at the peak of the response. All the responses were transient, lasting for a number of seconds. Essentially similar results were obtained upon intracellular photorelease of cyclic adenosine monophosphate or cyclic guanosine monophosphate, which are thought to be involved in mediating the chemotactic response.

CONCLUSION: These results suggest that human spermatozoa sense and respond to a temporal chemoattractant gradient. On the basis of these observations, we propose a potential model for the chemotactic response of spermatozoa in a spatial chemoattractant gradient.

Key words: chemotaxis/mammalian sperm chemotaxis/sperm chemotaxis/temporal response

Submitted on July 30, 2008; resubmitted on October 7, 2008; accepted on October 16, 2008.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.