Skip Navigation



Hum. Reprod. Advance Access published online on April 7, 2009

Human Reproduction, doi:10.1093/humrep/dep067
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF )
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
24/7/1739    most recent
dep067v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rozenberg, S.
Right arrow Articles by Christiansen, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rozenberg, S.
Right arrow Articles by Christiansen, C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Endometrium protection and acceptability of nasally administered continuously combined hormone therapy: a multicentre, multinational, double-blind trial in post-menopausal women evaluating three regimens of 17β-estradiol and norethisterone when compared with an orally administered 17β-estradiol norethisterone regimen

Serge Rozenberg1,6, Bruno Pornel2, Philippe R. Koninckx3, Santiago Palacios4 and Claus Christiansen5

1 Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, CHU St Pierre, Rue Haute 290, 1000 Brussels, Belgium 2 Brussels Menopause Center, Brussels, Belgium 3 Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, UZ Gasthuisberg, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium 4 Instituto Palacios, Salud y Medicina de la Mujer, Madrid, Spain 5 Nordic Bioscience A/S, Herlev, Denmark

6 Correspondence address. E-mail: serge.rozenberg{at}skynet.be, sergerozenberg{at}stpierre-bru.be

BACKGROUND: To determine the optimal daily dose of intranasal hormone therapy (HT) in order to achieve adequate endometrial protection.

METHODS: Multicentre, double-blind/double-dummy randomized controlled trial (Phase III) was conducted in 1741 women to compare a daily intranasal dose of 350 µg 17β-estradiol (E2) together with 50, 175 or 550 µg norethisterone (NET) with the oral administration of 2 mg E2 and 1 mg NET, over a period of 52 weeks. An endometrial biopsy was performed at the end of HT use.

RESULTS: Most women (73–86%) had an ‘atrophic and/or inactive’ endometrium. Lower doses of NET were associated with a higher incidence of ‘proliferative’ endometrium. The incidence of vaginal bleeding decreased with time. During the last 4 months of the study, 88.1% of women using the highest dose of NET were in amenorrhoea when compared with 71.7% using the oral comparator (difference 16.5%; 95% confidence interval: 10.9–22.0%) (P < 0.001). Premature discontinuation rates were in the range of 12–17% for the three nasal regimens and 22% for the oral comparator.

CONCLUSIONS: HT using a fixed intranasal dose of 350 µg E2 combined with 550 µg NET is a safe regimen, in relation to 1 year endometrial safety. This regimen is associated with less vaginal bleeding when compared with an oral comparator using 2 mg E2 and 1 mg NET.

Key words: hormone therapy/menopause/intranasal/estradiol/norethisterone

Submitted on October 1, 2008; resubmitted on December 28, 2008; accepted on January 13, 2009.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.