Skip Navigation



Hum. Reprod. Advance Access published online on October 14, 2009

Human Reproduction, doi:10.1093/humrep/dep347
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF )
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
25/1/179    most recent
dep347v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Garcia-Cruz, R.
Right arrow Articles by Garcia Caldés, M.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Garcia-Cruz, R.
Right arrow Articles by Garcia Caldés, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Cytogenetic analyses of human oocytes provide new data on non-disjunction mechanisms and the origin of trisomy 16

R. Garcia-Cruz1,5, A. Casanovas1, M. Brieño-Enríquez1, P. Robles1, I. Roig2, A. Pujol4, L. Cabero3, M. Durban4 and M. Garcia Caldés1

1 Unitat de Biologia Cel·lular i Genètica Mèdica, Facultat de Medicina, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain 2 Molecular Biology Program, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, NY, USA 3 Servei de Ginecologia i Obstetrícia, Hospital de la Vall d'Hebrón, Barcelona, Spain 4 Clínica Eugin, Barcelona, Spain

5 Correspondence address. E-mail: montserrat.garcia.caldes{at}uab.es

BACKGROUND: Nowadays, oocyte donation is an extended practise in IVF programmes. However, to date, little information on aneuploidy frequency in oocytes from donors is available. Aneuploidy is one of the major causes of embryo and fetal wastage as well as of congenital mental and developmental disabilities. It is known that most aneuploidies are due to non-disjunction events occurring in the maternal germ line. Linkage studies have associated abnormal patterns of meiotic recombination to the origin of the non-disjunction event in many aneuploid conditions.

METHODS and RESULTS: In the present study, we analyse the frequency of chromosome imbalances in a series of metaphase I (MI; n = 44) and metaphase II (MII; n = 103) oocytes from 140 young donors (aged from 18 to 35 years, mean age 26.6) after hormone-induced superovulation. The aneuploidy frequency found in MII oocytes was 12.6%, and both whole-chromosome non-disjunction (1.94%) and premature separation of sister chromatids (PSSC) (12.6%) have been found. The chromosomes involved have been identified by multiplex fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH). Achiasmate chromosomes have been identified in MI oocytes (9.1%), with most of them corresponding to chromosome 16 (6.8%). For this reason, the meiotic recombination pattern of chromosome 16 has been analysed in prophase I oocytes (n = 81) by immunofluorescence staining against MLH1 protein and subsequent FISH with specific probes. Our results show a percentage of oocytes with non-crossover bivalent 16 (2.5%) and a high percentage of bivalents 16 with a single exchange (19.8%).

CONCLUSIONS: In the present study, we report the finding of a considerable frequency of aneuploidy in oocytes from young donors, with the frequency of PSSC being higher than the frequency of whole-chromosome non-disjunction. In addition, we report vulnerable patterns of meiotic recombination in chromosome 16 that may be at risk of leading to a non-disjunction event. This gives new data on the susceptibility of the control population to conceive a trisomic 16 embryo.

Key words: aneuploidy/chromosome non-disjunction/oocyte donor/meiotic recombination/trisomy 16

Submitted on May 18, 2009; resubmitted on August 26, 2009; accepted on August 27, 2009.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.