Electronic Letters to:
|
|
eLetters: Electronic letters published:
-
![[Read eLetter]](/icons/misc/sectionDOWN.gif)
Antenatal depression and preterm delivery
- Jacques Dayan, Christian Creveuil (11 March 2009)
|
|
|||
|
Jacques Dayan, Psychiatrist CHU Caen - Inserm, Christian Creveuil
Send letter to journal:
dayan-j{at}chu-caen.fr Jacques Dayan, et al.
|
Sir, We read with great interest a recent paper by Li et al. (2009) on the association between the presence of depressive symptoms during pregnancy and the risk of preterm delivery. The authors evidenced a significant association, in accordance with the results of several other previous studies. They cite in their article a study we published in 2002 on the role of anxiety and depression in the onset of spontaneous preterm labor (Dayan et al., 2002). To quote a part of the discussion Li et al. developed in their paper, our study uses “a slightly different outcome” than preterm delivery, a point we totally agree with. As we already stressed in our paper, preterm labor and preterm delivery are two complications that should be clearly distinguished from one another. It is however quite surprising that Li et al. completely omitted to cite a paper we published in 2006 that reports, on the same cohort of nearly 700 women, the analysis of the effects of antenatal depression and anxiety on spontaneous preterm birth (Dayan et al., 2006). Based on the methodological discussion we already had in our papers, we would like to comment on a few points relating to Li et al's article. The first point concerns the self-questionnaire used to assess depression (CES -D), which has never been validated during pregnancy. The CES-D includes several items describing somatic symptoms commonly experienced by the women during the first trimester of pregnancy, that may be misleading as indicators of depression in pregnancy. The authors stated that the removal of such items did not change the hazard ratios relating preterm delivery to depressive symptoms but, to our knowledge, there are no validation studies of the CES-D without those items. The choice of another tool, validated during pregnancy – for instance the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS; Murray and Cox, 1990) – would have been more appropriate. Our second comment relates to the outcome variable. We think that it would have been of interest to differentiate between spontaneous and indicated preterm deliveries. These two outcomes broadly differ in their etiology and perhaps also in their association with depression. Our third and final comment refers to the issue of multiple pregnancies; it is a known and strong obstetric risk factor of preterm delivery, which could act as a confounding factor. The strength of the association between depression and preterm delivery may also be supposed to be different than with a singleton. Since the expected number of multiple pregnancies would probably not be sufficient to make that variable part of the potential confounders or effect modifiers considered in the analysis, we think that it would have been advisable to exclude those cases, as we did in our own studies. References Dayan J, Creveuil C, Herlicoviez M, Herbel C, Baranger E, Savoye C, Thouin A. (2002) Role of anxiety and depression in the onset of spontaneous preterm labor. Am J Epidemiol 155(4):293-301. Dayan J, Creveuil C, Marks MN, Conroy S, Herlicoviez M, Dreyfus M, Tordjman S. (2006) Prenatal depression, prenatal anxiety, and spontaneous preterm birth: a prospective cohort study among women with early and regular care. Psychosom Med 68(6):938-46. Li D, Liu L, Odouli R. (2009). Presence of depressive symptoms during early pregnancy and the risk of preterm delivery: a prospective cohort study. Hum Reprod 24(1):146-53. Murray D, Cox JL. (1990) Screening for depression during pregnancy with the Edinburgh depression scale (EPDS). J Reprod Infant Psychol 8:99- 107. Conflict of Interest:None declared |
|||